This is something I have been thinking about as I continue to treat a lot more gymnasts who come to me with injury or performance issues. I’m always trying to break down the problem to help the athlete, but also find the “spark” that created it. One pattern that has emerged surrounds gymnasts who are struggling with their flexibility, but unfortunately are continuing to do things in training that perpetuate the issue.

Before sharing more, remember if you want to learn everything I use for gymnastics flexibility, you can download my free”10 Minute Gymnastics Flexibility Guides” here

It bothers me when coaches get upset with a gymnast for having limited shoulder flexibility, but then turn around and have the gymnast do 100’s of pull ups, leg lifts, and rope climbs that may be causing the loss of shoulder motion from excessive lat stiffness. Whose fault is it really? Granted there are gymnasts who unfortunately don’t put regular effort into flexibility programs like they should. But, we want to make sure that the exercise selections we chose for our gymnasts are not further contributing to their lack of mobility. Here is what I mean.

Limited Overhead Mobility

Take an athlete who has limited overhead mobility for example. Often times I find limited overhead mobility in gymnasts comes from soft tissue restrictions in the lats, teres major, pec major and minor, and other internal rotators that may develop over years of training. I also find it comes from strength and conditioning programs that don’t have proper ratios of upper body pushing to pulling exercises. I touched on this in a very popular article I wrote entitled “Gymnastics, Please Stop Doing These Stretches (Part 2)

If a gymnast is known for having “tight shoulders” that limits their handstand and swinging skills, why are we continuing to have that athlete do a high volume of pull ups, rope climbs, push ups, and leg lifts? Doing high volume of these movements may create ongoing stiffness in these areas, and as a result further contribute to the loss of overhead mobility over time.

It may be a better option to modify the amount of volume these athletes do, and instead replace those exercises with more horizontal pulling type motions to help create balance. Also adding in regular soft tissue work and mobility drills would be really important. This will help them continue to get the strength training effect, but won’t continue to perpetuate their overhead mobility issue.

Limited Hip Mobility 

This same concept can be applied to hip mobility restrictions that are present in some gymnasts. Similar to above, I find limited split or leap mobility limitations in gymnasts tends to from soft tissue restrictions groin tissue, 2 joint quadriceps muscle (rectus femoris) and hip flexor tissues. Again I also find it comes from strength and conditioning programs that don’t have proper ratios of upper body pushing to pulling exercises. This tends to be more pronounced in the lower body for gymnasts, as coaches program 10 single leg or double leg pushing exercises (box jumps, squats, broad jumps) and overlook proper ratios of single leg or double leg pulling exercises (hip thrusters, RDLs, etc). I touched on these concepts in another article I wrote “Gymnastics Stop Doing These Stretches (Part 1)

View this post on Instagram

Along with squats and lunges based patterns for hip development, I’m a huge fan of regularly using single leg end range hip hinging strength. I think this end range hip extension tends to be heavily overlooked in many gymnasts (I was very guilty as gymnast/ younger coach). It shows up as a lack of strength/explosive power into hip extension of tumbling, single leg jumps, and eccentric control of landings. Not to mention, this lacking glute motor control and strength at end range can be a huge issue related to the extension based back pain issue that is unfortunately a huge issue in gymnastics. Following the strength periodization phase of our strength, I’m a big fan of this single leg hip jump progression and kettle bell swings noted from last week for power development. Give it a try, and make sure to cue the athlete properly to avoid lumbar extension/hamstring dominant issues. #gymnastics #performance #injuryreduction #hips

A post shared by Dave Tilley, DPT, SCS, CSCS (@shift_movementscience) on

Again, if the athlete is known to have “tight hips” why are they being asked to do really high volumes of squats, box jumps, leg lifts, v ups, and other hip flexing based strength? It may be of more benefit to replace those hip flexion based core exercises with things like plant crawls to get the core strength, and program more posterior chain and pulling exercises to create balance. This will allow for better balance of glute/hamstrings for power development as well as 360 deg core strength, but also won’t continue to feed their limited anterior hip mobility.

View this post on Instagram

Kettlbell swings are something I feel should be a staple in gymnastics strength and conditioning programs. Although it takes time to learn proper technique, teach progressions, and supervise for good mechanics, I feel it has direct carry over for powerful hip extension we are all looking for to increase heigh of tumbling/vaulting/dismount skills. In the comparison I tried to use slow mo examples to demonstrate this. Obviously the springs effect tumbling but the movement principles remain the same and we need to teach hip extension mechanics. In the summer I utilize both single leg and double leg hip dominated pulling exercises for strength, then in the preseason try to focus on power conversion and gymnastics specific skill techniques to tie it all together. They are also part of my end stage rehab and return to sport following a back injury to develop power, endurance, and anti extension core work using proper breathing patterns. I suggest finding a good strength coach (shout out Dave Picardy and Derek Goff of TreeHouse Athletics for my lesson) or do some research to start learning about how to build them into a gymnasts programs.

A post shared by Dave Tilley, DPT, SCS, CSCS (@shift_movementscience) on

Concluding Thoughts

I’ll be the first to admit I made mistakes like this when I was a younger coach, but as I learned more about human movement and strength program design I have changed my approach quite a bit. Hopefully people found this interesting and maybe got some lightbulbs going off in readers minds. Take care,

Dr. Dave Tilley DPT, SCS

1 reply
  1. Paul Goedecke
    Paul Goedecke says:

    Dave, as a boy’s coach I have boys ages 6-18. I am sure that each age has different strength and conditioning requirements. As I am the only coach for all levels, I have one S&C chart for all to go through modifying the numbers and some of the ring strength moves towards age and ability levels.
    What would be a general S&C chart you would recommend that covers these concepts above so that we don’t create flexibility and further injury issues especially for boys programs?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.