The Ultimate Guide to Gymnastics Strength

Table of Contents


First off, brace yourself because this is a monster of an article. After I released an extremely popular article on The Ultimate Guide to Gymnastics Flexibility (find it here) I had a lot of requests for a similar one on Gymnastics Strength. So, first, be sure to grab the free worksheets/downloads below. Second, keep in mind the first half here is more theory and concepts. The second half is the practical drills, exercises, and implementation parts. Dive into whatever you are most interested in!

Without a doubt, strength and conditioning is one of the most important aspects to the sport of gymnastics. It is a foundational pillar that must be present in training for performance success, optimal health, and a reduced risk of injury risk. It falls under the larger umbrella category of Physical Preparation. Alongside strength and conditioning, other key areas are technical development, flexibility, recovery, and more. They complement other important mental areas of training like managing fear or emotions, developing focus, and resilience.

In this blog post, I am going to take a deep dive into Gymnastics Strength. I’m going to blend both the traditional concepts and the newer research-based concepts. I will then give suggestions about what this means for practical day to day training. Lastly, I will break down the different movement categories, offer many video examples, and discuss programming. My hope is that by doing this, it will help many technical coaches, medical providers, gymnasts, and strength coaches working in the sport.

Before we kick things off, I have made some brand new free resources for people to help use this guide.

  1. I filmed and entire free lecture, and made ‘fill in the blank’ style templates for you to use planning your yearly, monthly, and daily strength programs. It has full examples (the pictures used in this blog) and worksheets that you can fill in. Find those for free by entering your email here!
  2. Also, you can get my entire book chapter “The Gymnastics Strength Guide” here which expands more on these concepts.

The Gymnastics Strength
and Power Guide

  • Methods and exercises for increasing strength and power in gymnasts
  • Explanations on why gymnasts should use both weight lifting and body weight strength
  • Teaches concepts of planning, specific sets or reps, and planning for the competitive year 

We take our privacy seriously and will never share your information.  Click here to read our full privacy policy.




The Gymnastics Growth – Skill Crossroads

The sport of gymnastics has evolved significantly. It is now substantially harder than it ever was twenty or even ten years ago. Alongside this, the equipment and technology used also have advanced. Although these advances are useful for pushing the frontier of gymnastics skills that can be performed, they also bring about exponentially more force being placed on the bodies of gymnasts. This brings more risk and more need for baseline physical preparation. 

This advance skill level demands more strength, power, and technical development from athletes. It also brings about notable increases in the risk of both acute and overuse injury.

When you look at the global landscape of gymnastics one thing is clear: younger gymnasts are doing harder skills, at higher repetitions, many more hours per week, and in some cases competing more times per year. A vast majority of these athletes are very young kids or adolescents, who are far from being fully matured. Due to all these circumstances, adequate physical preparation for gymnasts is paramount.

This main reason strength and power development are so crucial is because they allow a gymnast to produce, transfer, and absorb force more efficiently. Being able to manage high amounts of force is how advanced gymnasts perform incredible skills and optimize their safety over multiple years.

Gymnasts that are not physically, technically, or mentally prepared for high repetitions of difficult skills are at very high risk for injuries. They also tend to be set up for frustrations with a lack of skill progress. They tend to feel excessive strain when training or competing. For these reasons, we cannot afford to drop the ball on strength and power development in gymnasts.

The desire for gymnasts to compete bigger skills, or move up to higher levels at a younger age, has elevated the amount of risk in pre-pubescent gymnasts. When this is combined with issues like early specialization, year-round training, a lack of workload monitoring, and early recruiting, it creates the perfect storm for overuse injuries to stack up and burnout to creep in.

I have seen this combination of overuse injury and burnout cause many gymnasts to lose months or years of training. I’ve also seen it cause them to fail to make progress in their skill level. Worst of all, many chose to quit the sport.

It is now very common to see young, talented male and female gymnasts speeding through lower compulsory levels to train levels 9, 10, and elite at 11-14 years old.

This creates a situation where we have,

    • The most at-risk age group of rapidly developing skeletal systems (9-13 years old females, 10- 14 years old in males),
    • Making significant jumps in the amount of force each skill puts on their body (think of the huge force jump from kip cast handstands, compared to giants, compared to blind fulls, compared to Jeagers, etc.),
    • Also making significant increases in the amount of time they spend training in the gym (4x/week at 12 hours total for compulsory levels versus 6x/week at 24-30 hours total for optional/elite levels),
    • While often going through drastic body changes (physically, hormonally, neurologically, developmentally, socially) and not being at their full peak potential strength capacity.

This is not meant to scare people into stopping gymnastics. It’s to illustrate an important point. I have call this the “Gymnastics Growth – Skill Crossroads.” It is when gymnasts are jumping in skill level during their most at-risk years, placing them at extraordinary risk for reduced performance and increased injury.

I will openly admit I have not coached a nationally ranked, Division 1, or elite level gymnast. I understand this level of gymnastics performance is unique to the majority of what many gymnasts look to achieve. I am fortunate to have worked with or consulted with many gymnasts and coaches who do fall into this category. I am lucky that my last five years have allowed me the ground-level experience to work for this level of gymnast.

The principles that I will highlight in this blog related to strength and power have been used successfully with these athletes. For this reason, I feel they can be applied to everyone in gymnastics.

Should Gymnasts Lift Weights? My Change in Belief

Ten years ago, when working only as a coach, I firmly believed that only gymnastics specific conditioning was required. 95% percent of the strength programs I wrote for gymnasts I worked with comprised of what I did as a gymnast growing up. They were full of bodyweight press handstands, pull-ups, rope climbs, leg lifts, push-ups, squats, lunges, box jumps, and sprints.

Like many other coaches and people involved in the sport, I swore by using only gymnastics specific bodyweight conditioning. I was openly opposed to the use of external weights, general strength exercises seen in mainstream fitness media, or other means of conditioning.

I also believe that gymnasts should be encouraged to train hard every day, and that cycling lighter intensity wasn’t necessary. I rarely had a plan longer than a few days or a week, and I definitely didn’t consider week to week, or month to month, fluctuations in training load.

I believed the myths associated with this mindset. I wasn’t educated or open-minded to the latest science, or what other sports were doing. I was hiding behind my ego with an excuse of “Gymnastics is different, this is what we always do.”

I wrongly believed hat anything but bodyweight strength exercises would cause gymnasts to get bulky, lose their flexibility, and create injuries. I felt the concept of using external weights or doing more general strength exercises like loaded deadlifting was a waste of time.

I stood by this idea with the thought that due to gymnastics being a bodyweight sport with unique demands for skills, only bodyweight exercises should be trained.

Then over the course of a summer in 2014, I started to notice something. We had more and more gymnasts on our team acquiring overuse injuries despite our best efforts.

On a weekly basis, gymnasts we coached were getting diagnosed with stress fractures, growth plate problems, tendon strains, ligament issues, or other pains that really limited their ability to train. As you can imagine, their inability to practice stunted their progress and ability to get new skills or move up in level.

I watched as huge groups of gymnasts became frustrated, became disengaged with training, and became depressed because they could not participate in their primary source of social interaction. Parents were equally upset to see their kids in this state. As more gymnasts became hurt, coaches too became disengaged. Practices seemed to become a drag with more kids hurt than healthy, and coaches felt stuck not knowing what to do to make a difference.

Over months, what started out as a fresh new summer and excitement to train skills slowly turned into day after day taped ankles, doctors’ visits, constant sore wrists and elbows, and needing to modify training because of injuries.

This spike in injuries came as a two-way street, with a paralleled drop in performance. Besides those that couldn’t train due to injury, I also found that many of our gymnasts were not as powerful as I expected them to be. This problem was despite spending countless hours on strength, cardio, and skill technique during the week.

There were a few athletes that needed to turn up the dial on their training intensity, but surprisingly many were doing precisely what they were asked. They were showing up to practice regularly and putting in a ton of work.

They left practice every day drained by the strength, cardio, and skill programs we were asking of them. It’s not that people weren’t making progress. It just was not nearly at the rate I felt should be seen, based on both their work and our coaches’ work in training.

I distinctly remember scratching my head, looking at all the training plans from the last months, and wondering what was happening.

I asked myself – “If we are doing all the gymnastics strength exercises I see online and at clinics, why aren’t the gymnasts getting stronger?”

This period of frustration was all occurring as I had just started my first job working as a newly licensed Physical Therapist. Through my Physical Therapy career, I began to meet and talk with more high level “non-gymnastics” coaches, athletes, and strength and conditioning professionals.

There were several long talks over lunch, and video discussions with people I had developed a network with. I started to have some very eye-opening moments when looking at how all other sports trained and then reflecting on methods our coaching team applied in our gym.

After these long talks and periods of reflection, I more or less went off the deep end wanting to learn more. This period caused me to spend almost an entire year studying as much as I possibly could in strength and conditioning literature. I read books, studied research, went to courses, and asked to shadow strength and conditioning friends of mine. I also read work from fantastic strength professionals like Dr. Bill Sands, Mike Reinold, Eric Cressey, Mike Stone, Tudor Bompa, Charlie Weingroff, Mike Boyle, and many others.


The Olympic Weightlifting and Competitive Fitness community also had a huge influence on my education due to my involvement in a local gym. I was lucky to be able to spend time with some of the highest level Olympic Weightlifting coaches and athletes within the United States. Between online education, live courses, and in-person experiences, I became flooded with new information and ideas.

Even though I was learning from many people outside of gymnastics, I continued to study some of the highest-level JO, elite and collegiate gymnastics programs. I bought and analyzed many of the most popular educational products on gymnastics strength and conditioning I could find. I then reverse-engineered many gymnastics strength programs I had written before and spent an abundance of time analyzing other gymnastics strength programs people offered online, at lectures, or in clinics.

Due to my career in Physical Therapy, I was also reading quite a bit in the fields of injury research, rehabilitation concepts, and surgical textbooks. My motivation was to help patients overcome injuries, but I found a striking similarity between the language used in the strength and conditioning literature and what I was studying.

Following all this reading, I came to realize something significant: I was very wrong about gymnastics strength, conditioning, and injury mechanisms.

The more that I treated gymnasts as a medical provider, studied current strength and conditioning, and learned colleagues that I had met, the more I realized how misguided my thoughts were. I realized that all these injuries and issues related to limited power were not because gymnastics was hard, or gymnasts were not trying hard enough. The truth was found in our approach being nowhere near what science and expert opinion outlined as the best ways to prevent injuries, develop strength, increase power, and plan training.

I started to learn how the unbelievably high rates of overuse and traumatic injury in gymnastics came down to a simple equation: tissue in the body was being loaded at a significantly higher rate than it could handle (1-7).


Load Balance – The Universal Athletic Principle

Despite many factors playing into how much load was being applied, or how much capacity tissues had, the basic equation of load was out of balance. At a foundational level, muscles, ligaments, tendons, and bones were breaking down because the load being placed upon these tissues repetitively during skills or routines was too high for them to handle. (8-14)

For the issue of lacking power output during skills, the same mismatched dosage of workloads created a lack of strength adaptations. I read in multiple textbooks how increased strength was the foundation of power and rate of force development.

I learned about how exercise selection, intensity, and volume must be tailored to the athlete. In our gym, some athletes were being underdosed, causing them not to be stressed enough to increase their strength. Some athletes were being overdosed, without the proper recovery environment or time interval. Both scenarios caused the athlete to not positively adapt to the training.

Most of all, I realized I did not have a system to plan, track, and objectify the workloads that occurred every day. Textbooks I read had a “mad scientist” approach to how meticulously they planned pieces of training. The highest-level coaches had strength programs that went from individual sets or repetitions in one exercise, to four-year plans that aimed to peak athletes for major competitions. I came to learn about this term, periodization, that existed in all successful sporting programs, and discovered a considerable body of incredible science on this topic (15-22).

I was not mindful enough of counting repetitions of skills or routines. I also was not tracking strength exercises across multiple weeks. I wasn’t thinking critically enough about what types of energy systems we were training, and how that impacted our physical preparation. Similar work had just started emerging on the concept of workload ratios and injury risk in many other elite-level sports. Their concepts were echoing research in periodization.

In conclusion, I felt there was not enough emphasis being placed on scientific-based physical preparation for athletes I trained. We were following very excellent coaching expertise on how to build gymnastics skills, but significantly lacked information from this large body of literature about physical preparation, injury mechanisms, periodization, and workload management.

I took away a few major concepts that I wanted to apply in training. For one, my time spent studying the literature validated the idea that tissue break down was likely occurring in many gymnasts due to overuse or under preparation, along with a lack of planning and load monitoring.

I have always had the gut instinct that there is a “sweet spot” for doing too much or too little, with both possibly leading to problems. Tim Gabbett, and many other great academic strength and conditioning researchers helped outline this (16-27). It appeared that if tissue was underprepared, it created an elevated risk of break down during sports training. If tissue was being overtaxed, it too seemed to elevate the risk of break down during sports training.

These concepts lined up with the concepts noted above in the periodization literature, which outlined an optimal dose of work and recovery, so athletes could progress over time and peak for big competitions. It also seemed to correlate with the abundance of physiological and biomechanical research I studied on injury rehabilitation (1, 4-5, 8, 11, 19, 28-34). It also lined up with the hundreds of gymnasts that I was treated for similar injuries. It was striking how much of these ideas from seemingly different fields overlapped.

The second major take away I wanted to apply in training was the science of strength and conditioning. Through these books and research, I learned the neuromuscular physiology of strength training, and how it was the foundation for explosive power many gymnasts desired. Several academic texts outlined the need to stress muscle tissue beyond bodyweight loading. The concept of progressive overload for strength improvements was present as a theme throughout all the research related to performance progress and injury management.

It seemed that strength was the foundational base for increasing speed, enhancing explosive power, and maximizing output. I read about how athletes across multiple sports (some research including gymnastics) were able to see enormous increases in their power with the proper application of resistance training. The programs included adequate planning, exercise selection, and a periodized systematic approach to physical preparation programs.

The third take away I wanted to apply, as I found it most interesting, was the science of cardiovascular and energy systems training. I learned about specific energy systems like the anaerobic and aerobic systems, and the complexities included in each system. They work within different time domains, using different metabolic pathways, have various sources of fuel, have different negative consequences on human performance, and have varying degrees of contribution to energy usage based on the exercise task at hand. I saw how these different systems had a particular way of being trained to increase an athlete’s cardiovascular capacity to create massive power output.

When I reflected on the stories, gymnasts told me about how their injuries occurred, many times the word “fatigue” was used. Whether fatigue referred to a “fatigue fracture” or stress fracture in a bone or fatigue in a floor routine that caused someone to land short and hurt themselves in their last pass, it was a prevalent theme in injured gymnasts.

All of this made me scratch my head quite a bit. I was shocked to see how much information was available related to the science of strength, contributing factors to injury and training of energy systems. When I took a step back to synthesize all the ideas, I was conflicted between what I had been taught in gymnastics for the first five years of my career, what I was seeing done in gymnastics gyms across the world, and what the current body of science suggested were the most optimal way to approach these areas.

It seemed that there was a connection between updating gymnastics strength and conditioning methods, reducing injury risk, and elevating performance. It also seemed there was a large gap between the available information and what information was making its way into everyday training.

I ended up combining my more traditional gymnastics strength programs with aspects of “non- gymnastics” strength programs, based on expert coaching opinion and the available science. I wanted to try a newer “hybrid” approach of gymnastics strength and conditioning I felt was desperately needed.

I had seen versions of this in many college programs, including our team in college that lifted 2x/week in preseason. I had also seen hints of it with other high-level coaches looking to branch out. I wanted to give it a try but, more by diving in with both feet instead of just dipping my toes in the water.

It appeared the sport of gymnastics might be best served with a model that combines the best and most essential traditional bodyweight gymnastics strength exercises with proper weight lifting, external loading, and more general physical preparation approaches. One that also combined the expert opinion of many great gymnastics and strength coaches with the available science.

I felt the abundance of science related to formal strength and conditioning, as well as the benefits or external weight lifting, could be married to the traditional gymnastics sport-specific exercises. Myself and many other gymnastics friends of mine, who themselves were elite or Division 1 gymnasts, felt that it could be a catalyst for an incredible new approach to gymnastics strength and conditioning. We collectively felt it could yield much higher levels of performance, as well as lowered injury rates and longer careers.

It is undeniable that gymnasts need to do a substantial amount of bodyweight physical preparation every day, and every week, to be strong enough to perform high-level skills but also stay safe in the process. Many gymnastic specific exercises such as press handstands, core exercises, pull-ups, rope climbs, leg lifts, plyometrics, body tension exercises, shaping drills, and others are essential to do in training.

However, my research and extensive studies have shown me that we also must be exposing a gymnast to a significant amount of non-traditional gymnastics strength and conditioning exercises. These exercises often involve using external load during basic movements patterns (squatting, deadlifting, weight pressing) that don’t look like gymnastics skills. These exercises that are more general involve dumbbells, barbells, kettlebells, weight vests, and other various loading tools to foster adaptation through overload.

How Lifting Weights Helps Reduce Injury Risk in Gymnastics

The physiological science of strength training points to the appropriate application of these tools as very beneficial. They can assist in creating massive increases in sports performance, mainly through increasing strength, power, speed, and force transfer through the body. They can also serve to improve the human body’s ability to handle and disperse load, thus reducing the risk of injury in gymnasts.

This approach is especially true in the upper body where the wrist, elbow, and shoulder joints do not possess nearly the same force absorbing anatomy as the legs. Gymnastics is such a unique sport that places such a high demand on the elbows wrists and shoulders of gymnasts, often 2-4x body weight or more. It is this under preparation and excessive loading, paired with the inherent lack of weight bearing anatomy that sets the stage for many common injuries that plague gymnasts.

These categories include growth plate, cartilage, or soft tissue injuries within the wrist or elbow. (35-36) Many variations of upper body overload injuries exist, but some of the most common are known are

    • “Gymnast Wrist” (growth plate or carpal bone injury),
    • OCD (Osteochondritis Dissecans)
    • Stress fractures
    • “forearm splints” in male gymnasts (ulnar bone stress reactions), and
    • Triceps growth plate traction injuries (olecranon apophysitis).

Due to these widespread injuries, and the enormous need for upper body strength required to perform high-level gymnastics skills, I feel it’s crucial that we adequately prepare the upper body of young gymnasts appropriately over time.

I think that the proper use of external weights can help bridge the gap between the limited weight bearing capacity of these joints, and the incredibly high forces placed on them in gymnastics skills. I feel an openness to this approach will drastically reduce the risk of injury and enhance performance.

When you look at the lower body and core, it is also very clear to see that there is a huge problem with overuse injury from high loads. The spine takes enormous force during skills and tumbling leading to common issues like

    • Stress fractures of the spine like spondylolethesis
    • Disc and Nerve irritation
    • Muscular strains and ligamentous sprains

External loading can help stress the core to buffer the high forces of skills. This is especially true when looking at tumbling and bar events.

Then lastly, it is very well known that the high jumping and landing forces of gymnastics (measured between 10-14x body weight) can produce huge injury risk. Year after year I treat or hear about 100’s of gymnasts who suffer lower body injuries from high loading such as

    • Sever’s Disease and Osgood Schlatters
    • Achilles tears and tendinopathies
    • Shin Splints
    • Meniscus and ACL tears
    • Stress fractures
    • Hamstring growth plate injuries (ischial apophysitis)
    • Groin, quad, and hip flexor strains
    • Hip labral tears


There is also significant evidence of these injury rates being a huge worldwide problem across all levels in gymnastics. You can find the latest research here.

If we take a big step back, we have to appreciate that all of these injuries have a common risk factor of force overload (among many others). The amount of loading being done on the body is higher than it’s capacity. Either over time (stress fracture) or in one instance (ACL Tear) the loading is so high it causes tissue damage, and injury often results. More mixed strength programs are one of the best evidence-based tools to reduce the risk of these things causing so much problems for gymnasts.

The question if gymnasts should lift weights during their strength programs is one of the most controversial topics in our current culture. My opinion is there are many myths and misunderstandings about the potential role of weightlifting in gymnastics. As a result, I feel we are missing out on brilliant potential benefits. A close-minded approach to this topic that exists in our current culture is the trap that I once fell into as noted above.

Misunderstandings, along with a lack of time spent studying academic work, create a situation where coaches, medical providers, and gymnasts are missing out on a great source of potential gain. Here are some things to consider related to the role of using weights during strength training in gymnastics.

Misunderstanding 1: Lifting Weights Makes Gymnasts Get Bulky and Lose Skills

There is a false assumption that by lifting weights a gymnast will automatically become big, bulky, and lose their lean body physique. Many fear that this will throw an athlete’s strength to weight ratio off and cause a loss of gymnastics skills. Although in theory, this does hold some truth, the reality of the situation is that this thought is very misguided related to how maximal hypertrophy and body mass is added to an athlete. As Dr. Bill Sands and many other great researchers have outlined, the parameters of hypertrophy in gymnastics and other sports require precise methods.

In his paper, “Should Female Gymnasts Lift Weights?” (published in 2000!) he outlines some interesting unpublished research he conducted with US national team members who did or did not incorporate weight training in their strength programs leading up to the Sydney Olympics. He notes,

“Anthropometry on gymnasts during preparation camps before the Sydney Olympics indicates that weight training does not cause gymnasts to bulk up (unpublished data, WA Sands, 2000). The gymnasts were 33 US national team members, 14 of whom weight trained for two or more sessions per week. In spite of being older (18.1 ± 2.0 vs 16.5 ± 1.0 y), these gymnasts were lighter (48.0 ± 5.4 vs 52.1 ± 5.9 kg), had a lower body mass index (20.3 ± 1.9 vs 21.7 ± 1.9), and were slightly shorter (153.5 ± 4.0 vs 154.9 ± 4.3 cm) than the members of the team who did not weight train. More detailed anthropometry on these gymnasts was not permitted, owing to concerns about body fat and the potential for triggering eating disorders (Nattiv et al., 1994; Nattiv & Mandelbaum, 1993; Noden, 1994; Rosen & Hough, 1988; Wilmore, 1996).”

I do not know the specifics of this research, but this was incredibly interesting to me when reading it. This account on elite-level gymnasts falls in line with the large body of research combatting myths of athletes lifting weights and automatically becoming too “bulky” for sports success.

Research and literature support particular programming methods that must be used to discourage large mass gains and instead promote lean body mass and power development. (see this fantastic reviews in the reference sections for more). Over time with the right coaching, exercises, periodization methods, programming, nutritional guidance, and training habits, this fear of muscle mass impacting gymnastics skills can quickly be pushed aside. When a proper approach is taken, a strength program using external weights can be geared around increasing maximal explosive power in an anaerobic context, which is mostly what gymnastics requires (39-42).

I’ll be honest, it takes a crazy amount of time and work to learn about the science and correct application. It requires humility to seek out knowledgeable strength and conditioning professionals who can learn about gymnastics and be part of the interdisciplinary team. Just as being able to learn about gymnastic skills and teach them to athletes takes a lot of work and time, so does this concept.


Since adopting this newer model, every gymnast I have worked within the last five years, either coaching or for injury rehabilitation, does some form of strength work that utilizing external loading. I feel it is one of the main reasons progress has been seen following prolonged periods of plateau.

Dr. William Sands, who is an expert in fields of gymnastics biomechanics and strength, summarizes this idea brilliantly in his article, “Should Female Gymnasts Lift Weights?”

“Coaching folklore condemning weight training for gymnasts is probably misguided. Weight-training workouts that develop strength with minimal muscle hypertrophy are likely to enhance the performance of female gymnasts. The current skill-repetition approach to developing strength in female gymnasts may cause more hypertrophy than a well-designed program of weight training in the short term, but the relative effect of these forms of training on muscle growth during maturation is unknown.”

I find it very interesting that Dr. Sands highlights how the approach to high volume skill training may be causing more hypertrophy than a well-designed strength program. Similarly, I like that he highlights the need to use specific programming and strategies to optimize lean muscle hypertrophy that is ideal for gymnastics.

We need to train skills for performance, but the high cost of impact forces on young gymnasts’ body must be considered. I feel the balance of adequately developed technical proficiency in skills, paired with a hybrid approach to strength and physical preparation, is by far one of the most effective tools we have to combat injury, burnout, and stalled competition performance in the new era of gymnastics.

Misunderstanding 2: Lifting Weights Causes Injury

There is another false assumption that using weights is dangerous and will cause injury, especially in younger athletes who have not gone through puberty. First off, remember that the forces in gymnastics are astronomical, being upwards of 15x body weight. To say that external loading with weights is not okay due to safety concerns, but hypocritically not address the fact that the same gymnast takes 15x her body weight in force, hundreds of times per week during landings is a bit of a double standard.

The reality of the situation is that if you lift weights the wrong way, with no programming, and don’t understand technique then yes, the risk of injury is high. However, with the proper coaching and programming, this can be avoided, and injury risk is quite low.

Research and literature are abundant about how with proper programming and supervision for correct technique, the risk of injury or long-term damage to youth athletes is minimal (44-46). Also, there is research that supports the idea that organized strength programs that use external weight lifting may be one of the most effective methods for injury prevention (44, 47).

When you think practically about it, this makes sense. Remember I highlighted that injury tends to occur when tissues are underprepared and overloaded, causing damage and injury over time. It’s hard to wrap our head around this in gymnastics, often because we don’t see the high forces during gymnastics skills.

It’s not like a sport like Olympic Weightlifting, where you can see the amount of weight someone lifts and the force that goes through their body. Gymnastics skills show an immense amount of power, height, and amplitude, which make it hard to conceptualize how much force goes through the bodies of athletes.

The fact remains, the forces are real. 

There is even more research on the role of formal strength and conditioning with external loading about enhancing sports performance, reducing burnout risk, and encouraging long-term athletic development (47-58).

Strength training that appropriately uses external loading is beneficial to help increase power, break up the monotony that often comes with single sport training, and is correlated to athletes remaining in their sport for a more extended period. This too makes sense, as being able to prepare young gymnasts for high force skills physically can maintain their long-term potential and add variety to their weekly routine.

I honestly feel that many gymnasts simply do not possess the strength to handle the forces of gymnastics. Whether it manifests as the ability to perform skills or unfortunately as being plagued with injury after injury, I see this in gymnasts on a weekly basis.

There comes the point where only bodyweight exercise or even light dumbbells aren’t enough to prepare a gymnast’s body for the insanely high forces of gymnastics. This problem is where adjunctive weight lifting can come into play. Weightlifting and periodization are tools used to systematically teach the body to handle more force, prepare the tissue for loading of skills, and teach proper movement mechanics as a method of injury prevention

Inevitably when considering age concerns and a developing athlete, growth plate injuries come into play. Again, the research is well established that with proper programming and intelligent coaching, the risk of long-term damage or stunted growth to young athletes with external loading can be minimized  (40, 44-47, 52, 56).

I will say that in the younger and less developed population, the focus should be much more about proper movement patterns and not so much moving heavy loads. We are cautious in our gym and rehabilitation clinic to give younger gymnasts close supervision, as often they do not possess the maturation and awareness to safety as older athletes. We start to introduce external loading movement patterns around 10 with little or no weight, and then by 12 start to actually have them train with load.

As with anything else in gymnastics, it’s all about proper mechanics and consistency before intensity. When we add weight to our younger gymnasts in the gym, it is only when they demonstrate sound mechanics and understand what they are doing. If they show flawed technique, they do not get weight.

Just as with gymnastics, their goal is more on development and consistency in their movement. If you work with a strength coach who teaches proper movement patterns, understands programming, uses the right exercises, applies close supervision, and understands gymnastics, the risk of injury when using weights with younger athletes is minimal.

Misunderstanding 3: Lifting Weights Makes Gymnasts Lose Flexibility

The third misunderstanding in gymnastics is that by lifting weights, athletes will automatically lose their flexibility.

Again, when the correct approach and programming is used, this also is very untrue. It is true that following a strength training session, the range of motion may be acutely reduced from intentional muscle damage to promote adaptation. Even if proper recovery methods and rest time are given, it may last a few days with delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) (63).

On the contrary to popular thought, properly executed lifting with an external load in a full range of motion is actually one of the best ways to maintain or improve mobility, especially when eccentric contractions are biased (64-69). This tends to occur for a few reasons, one of which is the change induced to the muscle itself when placed under eccentric loading. Another mechanism proposed is the development of full-range control from a neurological point of view.

It is thought that by slowly moving through the range of motion with control and appropriate load, we are convincing the nervous system of safety. It may be that changes in structural tissue and slow exposure to “take the emergency brake off,” are why eccentric training over time yields progress in flexibility. If you are interested in more, please see studies on eccentric exercise in the reference section for much more in-depth histology mechanisms of eccentric training.

If you then take this motion from strength exercises and apply it to sports-specific gymnastics techniques, it can do wonders for maintaining a gymnast’s mobility. Interestingly enough, eccentric strength may also be one huge factor in preventing common types of hamstring, groin, Achilles or other lower body issues commonly seen in gymnastics (70-74). Following an assessment and soft tissue care (both in training and when appropriate in rehabilitation), I frequently prescribe

    • Eccentric chin ups for latissimus and teres major mobility
    • Eccentric push-ups for pec flexibility
    • Eccentric single leg /Romanian deadlifts, and slider fall outs for hamstring mobility
    • Eccentric calf and forearm lowers for ankle and wrist flexibility
    • Eccentric split squats for quad and hip flexor mobility
    • Eccentric lateral squats for adductor mobility

A combination of barbell work, along with unilateral exercises via kettlebells/dumbbells and body control drills, are great ways to go about this eccentric training. The equipment is relatively inexpensive, can be used for multiple athletes across multiple exercises, and tends to last a long time when taken care of appropriately.

I think the notion of losing flexibility is based on the mistaken idea that tissue permanently shortens when we lift weights and lengthens back out when we do stretching or flexibility work. As I covered extensively in the flexibility chapter, there is a lot more that goes into gaining and keeping flexibility. Not to mention the studies combatting the idea that muscle lengthens or changes structurally when we stretch.

Following lifting workouts, yes there may be temporary reductions in range (as happens with any strength methods). Inducing muscle damage can cause soreness, reduced force output, and discomfort. In the long term, when the right exercises, a continuation of soft tissue and mobility work, recovery as well as nutrition education, and the proper programming are used, this myth related to flexibility can again be pushed aside.

I have worked with many gymnasts who have undergone 2+ years of external loading from weightlifting in their strength programs, with no long-term issues related to their mobility. My current thought is that the losses in flexibility athletes experience come from many of the concepts noted in the chapter prior: overuse based soft tissue stiffness, natural growth changes, or flexibility methods that may stress passive structures instead of biasing active structures.

Weightlifting Is Only One Piece Of Our Strength Program

Am I saying weights, barbell, or kettlebell training should replace all traditional gymnastics strength? Not at all. I actually think only using external load is a very bad idea for gymnasts.

All of the gymnasts I work with for rehabilitation or sports performance, utilize external weights as one part of their overall strength or metabolic program.

They still do a very high volume of bodyweight, gymnastics skill-specific, and essential shaping strength on a daily basis. As with most things, the use of external weight lifting with gymnasts must be planned for and part of the larger picture for gymnastics physical preparation.
Gymnastics specific patterns like press handstands, leg lifts, pull-ups, and other well-known exercises continue to be staples in strength programs I write.

However, the addition of external loading within these programs can be significant. A few of these include:

  • Building quality movement patterns safely and early for an athlete that is regularly seen in high- level gymnastics (jumping, landing, squatting, reactive overhead control, traction type loading).
  • Systematically loading and adapting a gymnast’s body for everyday high-force situations of tumbling or dismount landings, high force overhead upper body impact, and high force overhead upper body swinging.
  • Slowly exposing the gymnast’s body to stress so it can adapt and get stronger, increasing resistance to force overload injuries that are an epidemic in gymnastics.
  • Helping to bridge the gap between lower force compulsory skills, and much higher force skills optional level or elite skills. I feel the jump between these types of skills and the lack of structural preparation in a gymnast’s body is a primary driver for sparking overuse injuries.
  • Helping to maintain global balance within the body and help create general physical preparedness to enhance long-term athletic development.
  • We also must remember that external weightlifting during strength must be used at the appropriate time in the competitive season. It must be in conjunction with a long-term plan that understands the goals of different phases throughout the year. This planning is an essential component of periodization.
  • Developing 360-degree core bracing and strength strategies that slowly expose the spine to a compression force, so the gymnast can learn to control it and protect their spines from injury.
  • Teaching a gymnast neurological control and coordination to express higher force transfer during skill work, causing increased power and increased amplitude.

Clearly, a bias towards weight lifting should not be the main focus during competition and championship season. I feel It should be utilized more in the non-competitive or summer training season, as well as the pre-season, and then maintained to some degree as appropriate.

If we can get past these myths, misunderstandings, and misconceptions about weightlifting, as well as be open to the adjunctive use of weight training with our athletes, I think we will see ongoing problems with injury and the number of gymnasts who fail to make progress in skills.

I highly encourage those readers that are still skeptical about integrating external loading into the sport to not take my word for granted and look at the research themselves. I want people to analyze the information out there, rather than blindly follow my advice.
Here are some of the most helpful resources I have found in trying to gather evidence to change my approach to strength training in gymnasts:

“Conclusions: Despite a few outlying studies, consistently favorable estimates were obtained for all injury prevention measures except for stretching. Strength training reduced sports injuries to less than 1/3 and overuse injuries could be almost halved.” (47)

“Summary/conclusions Resistance training is an effective method to enhance muscle strength and jump performance in youth athletes, moderated by sex and resistance training type. Dose-response relationships for key training parameters indicate that youth coaches should primarily implement resistance training programs with fewer repetitions and higher intensities to improve physical performance measures of youth athletes.” (48)

“Conclusion – Coaching folklore condemning weight training for gymnasts is probably misguided. Weight- training workouts that develop strength with minimal muscle hypertrophy are likely to enhance the performance of female gymnasts. The current skill-repetition approach to developing strength in female gymnasts may cause more hypertrophy than a well-designed program of weight training in the short term, but the relative effect of these forms of training on muscle growth during maturation is unknown.” (38)

  • The 2015 International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement on Youth Athletic Development (50)
    URL Link – (http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/49/13/843 ) Concluding Points (A few of many): General principles

“Youth athlete development is contingent on an individually unique and constantly changing base of normal physical growth, biological maturation, and behavioral development, and therefore it must be considered individually.

Allow for a wider definition of sports success, as indicated by healthy, meaningful and varied life-forming experiences, which is centered on the whole athlete and development of the person.

Adopt viable, evidence-informed and inclusive frameworks of athlete development that are flexible (using ‘best practice’ for each developmental level), while embracing individual athlete progression and appropriately responding to the athlete’s perspective and needs.

Commit to the psychological development of resilient and adaptable athletes characterized by mental capability and robustness, high self-regulation and enduring personal excellence qualities-that is, upholding the ideals of Olympism.

Encourage children to participate in a variety of different unstructured (i.e., deliberate play) and structured age-appropriate sport-related activities and settings, to develop a wide range of athletic and social skills and attributes that will encourage sustained sports participation and enjoyment.”

Conditioning, testing and injury prevention

“Encourage regular participation in varied strength and conditioning programs that are suitably age-based, quality technique driven, safe and enjoyable.”

“Design youth athlete development programs comprising diversity and variability of athletic exposure, to mitigate the risk of overuse injuries and other health problems prompted by inappropriate training and competition that exceed safe load thresholds, while providing sufficient and regular rest and recovery, to encourage positive adaptations and progressive athletic development.”

“Maintain an ethical approach to, and effectively translate, laboratory and field testing to optimize youth sports participation and performance.”

“Strictly adhere to a “No youth athlete should compete-or train or practice in a way that loads the affected injured area, interfering with or delaying recovery-when in pain or not completely rehabilitated and recovered from an illness or injury.””

“Summary – A compelling body of scientific evidence supports participation in appropriately designed youth resistance training programs that are supervised and instructed by qualified professionals. The current article has added to previous position statements from medical and fitness organizations and has outlined the health, fitness and performance benefits associated with this training for children and adolescents.”

“In summarizing this manuscript, it is proposed that

  1. The use of resistance training by children and adolescents is supported on the proviso that qualified professionals design and supervises training programs that are consistent with the needs, goals, and abilities of younger populations.

  2. Parents, teachers, coaches and healthcare providers should recognize the potential health and fitness- related benefits of resistance exercise for all children and adolescents. Youth who do not participate in activities that enhance muscle strength and motor skills early in life may be at increased risk for negative health outcomes later in life.

  3. Appropriately designed resistance training programs may reduce sports-related injuries and should be viewed as an essential component of preparatory training programs for aspiring young athletes.

  4. Regular participation in a variety of physical activities that include resistance training during childhood and adolescence can support and encourage participation in physical activity as an ongoing lifestyle choice later in life.

  5. Resistance training prescription should be based according to training age, motor skill competency, technical proficiency and existing strength levels. Qualified professionals should also consider the biological age and psychosocial maturity level of the child or adolescent.

  6. The focus of youth resistance training should be on developing the technical skill and competencyto perform a variety of resistance training exercises at the appropriate intensity and volume while providing youth with an opportunity to participate in programs that are safe, effective and enjoyable” (44)

  • The fantastic chapter by Gregory Haff, Dispelling the Myths of Resistance Training for Youths in Strength and Conditioning for Youth Athletes: Science and Application (40)
    (Book Link – https://amzn.to/31xmxK8)

I also encourage people in the gymnastics world to seek out qualified strength and conditioning coaches to assist them in learning about the science for strength training. Guessing or using methods that you’re unsure about, especially when it comes to proper form and technique, is not only dangerous but also may leave the gymnasts with untapped potential.

Before moving on and explaining more about changing our culture on resistance training in gymnastics, here is a fantastic quote from Dr. William Sands to wrap things up. This section can be found on page 303 of The Science of Gymnastics: Advanced Concepts. (URL Link – https://amzn.to/2G2S7aO)

“Finally, while most sports use weight training to enhance strength fitness, gymnastics has been stubbornly reticent to engage fully in practice, usually for fear of “bulking up.” However, at least one study of female senior national team gymnasts showed that those who practiced weight training were lighter, leaner, the same height and yet older than their non-weight training counterparts.”


What Does Strength, Power, and Plyometric Training Do To An Athlete?

After people have changed their thought process about a new model of strength and conditioning in gymnastics, they often have many more questions to ask when I’m talking to them. In this section, I will share some information about the effects and applications of gymnastics physical preparations.

Many people in the gymnastics community who I speak with are curious to know the basic adaptations of strength training, power training, plyometrics, and cardio programs.

They want to understand the foundational principles of how gymnasts can jump higher, run faster, become more flexible, or do higher-level skills. I think this is of unbelievable importance, and I respect them for wanting to learn more ways to help their athletes.

All coaches, support staff, and medical providers should have a basic understanding of how gymnastics physical preparation programs effect and change the human body. Without this knowledge, it’s like trying to navigate the forest without a compass. It’s very easy to get lost, and waste hours walking in the wrong direction.

The way to understand this is by studying the basic science of strength and conditioning principles. In the next section of this blog, I will try to share some of the basic concepts of the physiology of strength, power, and plyometric training. In a separate chapter, I will break down the basic physiology of cardiovascular and energy systems training.

I don’t want to go too deep on this, as entire textbooks are written on these subjects (many in the references section for those interested), but I do want to give people some basic concepts. Despite some use of terminology, my goal is not to overwhelm people, but instead, take the complex information and translate it in a way that is understandable for every day gymnastics training.

If muscle or neurological physiology is not in your wheelhouse, feel free to try and gather the central concepts and see the practical pieces. As with all areas, I encourage people to find local strength and conditioning professionals to learn more from.


Effects of Strength and Power Training on the Body

I view the entire neuromuscular system as being broken into three general categories:

    1. The actual muscle tissue (containing contractile units called sarcomeres)
    2. The neurological system (nerves, motor units that transmit signals to fire muscle tissue, and thelarger controller of the brain)
    3. The energy systems that fuel muscle tissue (ATP molecules and various metabolic pathways forATP replenishment)

In its most basic form, strength training aims to overload neuromuscular, bone, and cartilage tissue, to cause adaptations. (67,70-72) It is well known that all tissues within the human body require some form of loading to stimulate adaptation and growth. This is why so many people partake in sports, do regular exercise, and try to push themselves within their athletic training regimes.

The appropriate dosage of stress (strength exercises, plyometric drills, external loading) followed by the proper recovery dosage, signals the body to respond to the overload and improve itself (72-77). This happens through many complex signaling pathways, depending on mechanical, metabolic, or hormonal stress, that I do not wish to cover in-depth here.

The takeaway point is this – periods of optimal stress, followed by periods of optimal recovery, is how bones grow stronger, muscles grow in their force-generating ability, and cartilage increases its ability to handle the load (77-80). This is well known in gymnastics and is why many people spend so much time on physical preparation. We want gymnasts to have stronger muscles, ligaments, bones, and cartilage to perform skills and absorb force safely.

With these proper workloads, recovery, and training parameters, certain adaptations lead to increased strength and power over time (71). I will be lumping the categories of strength and power together for it to be better understood, but keep in mind strength and power have many differences in their specific body adaptations. Some of the most prominent principles for adaptation include the following.

Aspects of Muscle Architecture Changes in Response to Strength and Power Training


Muscle Cross-Sectional Area

A muscle’s force producing capacity is primarily dictated by the amount of muscle tissue present, combined with neurological factors (covered below), and energy systems factors (included later). From a muscle tissue point of view, the more cross-sectional area a muscle develops, the more potential it has to create force (41-42).

Many people’s minds jump to thoughts of hypertrophy or massive muscle bulk as seen in bodybuilders when they think about strength training. In reality, with intelligent programming, proper nutrition, and the right balance of mixed training, lean muscle mass can be created that is not massively detrimental to the body weight demands of gymnastics.

Strength training, typically in the form of resistance training or other advanced bodyweight demands, has been shown to increase the cross-sectional area within muscles, thus creating an increased potential for more force production (41-42). This serves as a foundational component of muscular strength.

Based on the type of exercises, the number of sets or repetitions, the total volume, the kind of contraction and other intensity related factors, progress in cross-sectional muscle area can be achieved.

Muscle Architecture

Outside of changes in cross-sectional area, many other factors contribute to overall force output of muscles. Some elements are modifiable through training, and others are not.

Some of these non-modifiable factors include inherent pennation angle, fascicle length, elastic stiffness, muscle temperature, and sarcomere number. 80 I used the word “generally” on purpose, as the research does have many conflicting thoughts on how these aspects of muscle architecture can change over time. I just have not spent that much time searching the archives of muscle physiology to state clearly with research what is valid.

Although I don’t want to overwhelm people with the physiology of this, readers should keep in mind many things go into baseline muscle strength. I have left out several other factors to be considered and encourage readers to check out the books listed if they are interested in more information.

Neural Aspects of Strength and Power Training

Increased Motor Unit Recruitment

A motor unit is defined as “an alpha motor neuron and all the muscle fibers it innervates.” (41) In lay terminology, that means the nerve that transmits a signal to a specific section of a muscle.

Motor units range in size and have generally been shown to be recruited from smallest to largest, based on the activity demand (82). Smaller Type I fibers (slower twitch and more aerobic) are typically recruited at lower demands first, followed by larger Type II fibers (faster twitch and more anaerobic) as higher demands and force rates are required.

The type of activity (slower or faster contraction speed, less or more resistance, concentric versus eccentric contraction) will bias certain muscle types and their motor units. Due to the nature of many activities, often Type I, and slow-twitch fibers are recruited first at a lower force demand. As the demands of the activity increase, the larger Type II fast-twitch fibers and motor units are recruited for additional force output (42).

Gymnastics primarily requires very fast, high power, demands of Type II fast-twitch fiber. However, there are also many important times in gymnastics when slower, type I, more aerobic fibers are required to perform skills over an extended period of time.

Increased Motor Unit Firing Frequency (also called rate coding)

The firing frequency of motor units has to do with the rate of impulse signaling that occurs. If a motor unit fires with much faster frequency, it may enhance overall force output. With more strength and power training, the rate of firing frequency of motor units can be improved. This can lead to more rapid and more significant total force production within a muscle.

Increased Motor Unit Synchronization

Similar to the number of motor units being recruited and the firing rate of those motor units, strength or power training can help improve the efficiency of motor units firing together (41).

With more coordination between groups of motor units in surrounding musculature, we may see significant jumps in strength or power over time. As synchronicity develops within a muscle or between adjacent muscles, force output increases.

On a more global level, this may also happen between joints. Muscle groups along the kinetic chain can be taught to fire with improved coordination as specific patterns of movement are repeatedly trained, and the brain adapts. A clear example would be power increase over time because an athlete learns to use their core, hip, knee, and ankle at the same time during a squat jump (41.)

This concept is mostly seen in gymnastics skill training. A demonstration of this would be when a gymnast learns to use their arms, core, and hips together during tumbling to increase power. Along with the mastery of technique, the increase in strength seen overtime has roots that are traced back to neuromuscular physiology.

Decreased Neuromuscular Inhibition

Our bodies have a built-in braking system with regards to how much maximal force our brain allows our muscles to exert. This aspect is an effort protect us from ourselves. Think about stories of moms lifting cars off their children in times of emergency. Or think of more unfortunate situations where individuals with epilepsy disorders suffer seizures where involuntary muscle contractions cause dislocated joints and broken bones.

The two situations represent positive and negative aspects to this built-in brake being lifted at certain times. It allows our muscles to tap into more force output in times of need. Strength and power training can help to lift this “brake” from the muscular system, as the brain starts to feel comfortable with the strength output more consistently (41-42). This concept is referred to as disinhibition.

Effects of Strength and Power Training on Bone

When correctly implemented, strength training has also been shown to have a very beneficial impact on bone health. Bone development is directly dependent on mechanical loading (82). As force is placed on a bone through compression, shear, axial loading, and other mechanisms, the cells of bones (osteocytes) respond to that stress (82-83).

The signals of force are turned into chemical inputs, a concept known as mechanotransduction. As a result, slowly over time as these stress and recovery cycles continue, the body works to grow new bone tissue to support future demands of a similar nature. This adaptation is commonly known as “Wolff’s Law.”

When the stress or recovery is inappropriately dosed, we see many familiar bone injuries surface. These include,

    • Spondylolisthesis (spine stress fracture)
    • Osgood Schlatters (knee growth plate inflammation)
    • “Gymnast Wrist” (wrist growth plate inflammation) and
    • OCD (cartilage damage of the elbow)

These are all injuries that occur when these stress to recovery cycles are not optimally implemented (3,11,56). The bone or cartilage is overstressed due to too much training, improper loading mechanics, or insufficient recovery, and over time inflammation or structural changes transpire.

Remember that on the other side of the coin exists. The positive effects of bone loading when adequately dosed gymnastics progressions, strength training, and overload occur. This approach can be a beneficial way to help bridge the gap between excessive loading from high force gymnastics skills and lacking loading capacity within bones.

Performance Point: Why This Matters for Gymnastics

The reason all the information covered matters for gymnastics is that progressive overload with the right exercises and program design can elicit these well-known adaptations of strength or power training.

By doing physical preparation programs, we can help gymnasts increase muscle cross-sectional area, increase motor unit discharge rates or synchronicity, tap into larger motor units typically associated with fast-twitch type II fibers, and help build the skeletal system’s resilience.

Theoretically, strength training with resistance or other forms of overload can tap into the larger, less recruited motor units. We can also increase cross-sectional area of lean muscle tissue, and when combined with concepts above, increase strength output. These muscle and neurological adaptations then can be used down the road in rate of force exercises (jumping, sprints, explosive drills) to help see increases in power during gymnastics skills.

For example, using dumbbells for Turkish Get Ups can serve as 1/5th the force a gymnast may take on their wrists during a handstand push up or front handspring vault. By slowly loading and progressing these Turkish Get ups and other movements over a few months, while continuing to optimize skill technique, we may be able to increase the wrist and elbow joints capacity to handle weight bearing forces.

This could increase bone and muscle strength, as well as improve the ability to produce force through the arms and core. This may help reduce the risk of injury resulting from numerous vaults or handstand impact skills, as well as build up a gymnast ability to transfer force and increase power during their skills.

Increasing foundational strength serves as the first step to developing many other aspects of physical preparation like power or explosive speed. Increases in the baseline levels of strength serve as the base for other important athletic qualities. The ability to sprint faster for vault or floor, the ability to tap harder on bars, and the ability to sustain longer endurance-based holds for handstand shaping, all have a commonality increasing the foundational strength level of a gymnast.

Many people in gymnastics want to see more power in their gymnasts during skills and routine performance. Regarding classic physics, power is a product of work done over time. It can also be viewed in the context of power is equal to force x displacement over time. I by no means claim to be an expert in physics, but the basic concepts can still be considered.

Therefore, to increase power output, we must either manipulate increasing the force expressed by a muscle, see increased distance traveled, or reduce the amount of time over which this work is performed (41). The most scientifically supported method for increasing the force a muscle can produce is through strength training (70). This is performed with a goal of achieving the adaptations mentioned previously.

The other way that we can increase power is through the manipulation of time. This is often done with specific gymnastics technique drills, plyometric training, and exercises that emphasize rapid movements to increase a muscles rate of force development. For this reason, power, the rate of force development, speed, agility, and metabolic capacity all have some dependence on fundamental strength.

I feel due to the importance of foundational strength following short periods of complete rest; gymnasts should focus on increasing maximal strength during noncompetitive times of the year. Placing more emphasis on foundational strength programs in the first few months of summer, as compared to only doing new drills and skills, may be one of the most important parts of the entire training year.

Following this gain in strength over 3-4 months, gymnasts can then be put through more specific power, the rate of force development, ballistic, and plyometric type training blocks. This helps translate the strength gains made to more gymnastics particular goals, like explosive bodyweight power. I feel this will help many athletes more optimally develop power for skills and routines, along with not overloading them excessively in the offseason with high force skills.

The most outstanding example is training proper squatting and hinging patterns through goblet squats or deadlifts in summer training. These exercises are well known to build up the strength of the quads, hamstrings, glutes, and core (85). The strength gains can be used on top of teaching gymnasts how to land correctly.

The increase in muscular strength, along with knowing how to move properly, may take a significant strain off young gymnast’s growth plates, tendons, and ligaments during the upcoming eight months where they will likely be put through 1000’s of repetitions of landings on hard surfaces that have been recorded at 10-14x body weight. (This will be covered in depth in the medical chapter but see the Science of Gymnastics: Advanced Concepts for the research on this).

The strength gains seen from training these movements can also be applied in the preseason for squat jumps, jumping lunges, kettlebell swings, or speed deadlifts, to increase power output in the legs. This can be transferred very quickly to gymnastics specific technique during tumbling and vaulting. By moving from a systematic strength cycle with squatting and deadlifting, to more power and rate of force development cycle, all while still working skill technique, may create incredible progress in skill power as well as performance.

For more information specific to strength and conditioning in pediatric youth athletes, please see chapter 13 of Strength and Conditioning For Sports Performance by Jeffreys and Moody.

Plyometric Training Effects

Plyometric training incorporates more rapid, fast twitch type exercises. The primary goal of this type of training is to increase a muscles ability to accept, absorb, and return force efficiently.

Typically, plyometric exercises are grouped into low, medium, and high impact. This categorization all has to do with the speed of repetition, and the force produced or absorbed by the body. They are also largely dosed based on their number of ground contacts, amount of loading per repetition, and many other factors that are specific to the athletes training or developmental age.

In gymnastics, plyometric training is regularly seen with panel mat lines, bounding jumps, and squat jump variations. However, there are many other very important applications of plyometrics beyond just these in the lower body, as well as in the upper body (push up shaping hops, handstand blocking) and the core (medball reactive throws and rebounds). These are less commonly used in gymnastics, but I think we will see change more in the future.

Just as with the strength and power section, the central adaptations from plyometric training can be split into muscle architectural effects, and neural effects.

Both of these effects tend to come under the umbrella of something known as the Stretch Shortening Cycle.86-87 This relates to the combination of active eccentric and concentric contractions with a relative isometric period between to handle force.

Muscle Architectural Effects of Plyometric Training

Muscle Hypertrophy

There have been some recent reviews that outline changes in whole muscle and individual fiber hypertrophy through plyometrics training.80 It is possible that over time training plyometrics influences power output in this way. Due to the limited amount of research in this category and my need to more fully understand this concept, I will not outline it more than stating its existence in the research.

Increased Elastic Tendon Energy Storage and Changes in Stiffness

One of the most frequently discussed mechanisms for increasing the stretch-shortening cycles ability to produce power is through changes in elastic stiffness. It has been outlined that with adequately dosed training, elastic tissues can be adapted to tolerate more force, as well as increase their efficiency in storing and releasing energy (88-89).

Optimal tendon stiffness, combined with the ability to have very fast coupling times (limited time between eccentric and concentric contractions know as an amortization phase) may be the main mechanism in increasing the energy storage of tendons working with muscles.

There is controversy among the gymnast world about the “optimal” amount of tendon stiffness. Some degree of tendon stiffness is important for energy transfer and skill power.

On the other side of the fence, is the argument that too much tendon stiffness may predispose overload and injury. This is a tricky line to walk with relation to long-term athletic development in athletes, which is why more information needs to be studied about plyometric training dosage in gymnasts.

To this day, I am still gathering my thoughts on the best approach to seeking out strength and conditioning experts to learn more. However, in my gut, I feel that we should lean on the side of slightly less structural tendon stiffness, and more on training the neuromuscular system to produce rigidity during skills. I feel that gymnasts that do not have optimal strength or technique rely on their passive tissues to produce and store the massive amounts of energy seen in gymnastics skills. Over time this may create tough spots related to chronic injury.

I have seen this anecdotally when lots of plyometric exercises or impact skills are trained, and gymnasts cannot get past chronic rotator cuff tendon, patellar tendon, and Achilles tendon issues. Given the intimidating rate of tendon ruptures in gymnastics for both the shoulder and lower body such as the Achilles, it is essential we work together for the best answer. Again, I am still investigating this topic and hope to keep growing my thoughts on the matter.

Neurological Effects of Plyometric Training

Increased neural firing rate and motor unit recruitment

Just as strength and power training offers an opportunity to enhance the motor unit efficiency, so does plyometric training. As we coach and educate gymnasts on the proper technique, and increase the challenge of plyometrics, the nervous system may help adapt to more power output. Motor units for contraction can increase their ability to fire, and more coordination between motor units may occur just like with strength training (88-89)

Local Increased Stretch Reflex Excitability

This is the most widely known thought behind why plyometric training helps increase reactive power. The stretch reflex is triggered by rapid elongation of muscles and tendons, which sparks a reflex for shortening of the muscle to prevent injury.

Despite conflicting thoughts, it has been proposed that through progressive training, plyometric drills can enhance the stretch-shortening cycle by tuning reflexes (88-89). This may be very beneficial for gymnastics, as skills seen on floor, vault, and bars happen at tremendous speeds.

Increased intramuscular and kinetic chain coordination

Just as noted in the strength and power section, with more repetitive training and movement practice, different joint segments may be more optimally synchronized to produce, transfer, and release energy. This is often seen in gymnastics as plyometric exercises are coached to increase body tension or stiffness, which helps to enhance force output (88).

Increased Central Nervous System through Disinhibition Effects

This concept parallels what was mentioned in the strength training section, but with some different applications. There has been some research that suggests over time with more plyometric training; the brain may become more anticipatory in its preparation for bounding. This is thought to be because pre- activation of muscle firing may enhance with training. Primarily, the brain and nervous system learn to anticipate contractions rather than simply react to them. Many people refer to this as a gymnast being able to “tune” the equipment and respond to force transfer more efficiently.

More information related to the dosage of plyometric training (frequency, intensity, and volume) for youth athletes can be found in Chapter 7 in Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application by Lloyd and Oliver. 91 For full chapters on plyometrics see Chapter 13 of Jeffreys and Moody 89, and Chapter 16 of Comfort and Turner (88).

Performance Point: What This Means for Gymnastics

When used in the proper dosage with an understanding of the training effects, plyometric training can be of enormous benefit to gymnasts. This is even truer when it is built into the proper periodization and formal strength program structure.

Plyometrics have been widely used in gymnastics, but I often fear due to our lack of physiological understanding of what it does to the body, we easily get carried away regarding suddenly spiking the amount of plyometric work done by increasing the intensity of exercises rapidly and not considering total volume.

We must remember we are working with children and adolescents who have not fully developed. We certainly want to prepare gymnasts for the massive forces and impacts that come with competing high- level skills. However, we need to keep in mind proper progression, a gradual increase in intensity, and dosage.

Just as with gymnastics skills, we would never do a full skill without the proper technique training, drills, progressions, and physical preparation. It may undermine the performance and safety of the athlete. The same remains true for plyometric exercises, strength training, and power training with young gymnasts. There are proper techniques, drills, progressions, and baseline physical preparations before we go crazy with very challenging exercises or high volumes.

If we do not respect the forces and demands of these exercises, we may be causing more harm than good.


Formal Program Design:
Periodization to Specific Strength, Power, and Plyometric Exercise Examples


I know many people want to learn more about specific exercises or drills for strength, power, and plyometric training to use with their gymnasts. Many also want to know how to formally create strength programs they can use with large groups, constrained time, limited space and limited equipment.

To help bring these nerdy concepts back down to earth about what we do in daily gymnastics training, here are some thoughts on designing strength programs and exercise ideas.

First, let’s start with how to implement information emerging on strength exercises and program design. I feel the first place to start is with planning and organization rather than talking about specific exercises (I promise I will offer all this information at the end of this blog). A considerable error I used to make is trying to find the “best exercise” before discussing goals, time of the season, equipment availability, space and coach availability.

Far too many times people look for exercises online and get excited to try them, to be disappointed when they don’t have time, space, equipment or alignment with current season goals. Ambitions fade, and people get frustrated with this opposite approach. To avoid this mistake, I will begin with program design and then break into specific exercises for people to consider.

Physical Preparation Program Design: Periodization, Goals and Timelines

The formal word for this concept is periodization. It highlights the systematic modulation of training intensity to promote progressive adaptation (16, 22, 72, 92).

When periodization models are properly implemented, we see a slow downward trend of energy and performance levels with strenuous training, followed by a slow return to full recovery. When optimally designed, the body does not return to the same baseline. It adapts to be more prepared for when a similar level of challenge occurs. This concept is known as supercompensation.

In the picture above, red represents a training load with reduced capacity, green represents recovery with increased capacity, and the left upward arrow represents increasing levels of capacity. This is a visual of super-compensation.

This model is extremely basic, but in the most simple form this is what we are aiming for in gymnastics. This is often referred to as “functional overreaching” or in stress theory “allostatic load” with tolerable stressors. As you can see, all the way on the far left the cumulative change with a “T” next to it represents total change, which is in the positive.

In contrast, when we either overdose stressors or underdose recovery, we do not see the same curve. Instead of seeing a full recovery, and supercompensation, we may see a slow downward trend. This usually can manifest as overuse injuries, excessive fatigue, underperformance, and in the most severe casese complete burnout.

As you can see, if inadequate time is allowed, or if another high load is applied to the athlete, we start to see the athlete’s capacity (and wellbeing) slide downhill. They have a reduced ability to accept load, and are at elevated risk of injury, illness, and mental health issues.

This happens in gymnastics when we have multiple training days that cumulatively tax athletes, when recovery methods are not utilized, or when athletes have high cumulative stress load in their lives. Sometimes super compensation can be missed from an under dosage of stressors in gymnastics, but that tends to be the minority of cases.

Multi Year Goals

I feel to achieve the more optimal result in the first picture with supercompensation, the best option for readers is first to take a gigantic step back and look at yearly training programs as well as overall goals.

From there, programs can be broken down into monthly, weekly, and daily workouts based on what fits for the gymnasts, coaching staff, and facility. If this is not done first, trying to implement the overwhelming amount of information in the strength and conditioning research can feel both chaotic and frustrating.

I will outline this in bullet point and template form, and then for visual learners include a summarizing picture below.

The process starts with the big picture of a multiyear goal and then moves to yearly goals. From here the year is broken up into multi-month blocks. From this, it proceeds to individual month blocks and into weekly chunks. Lastly, individual practices are outlined, followed by the specific work load prescription for individual events, days of strength, or energy systems training. This last step is done with the specific drill, skill, or routine assignments, or specific sets and repetitions for physical preparation.

Keep in mind; there is large variability in this based on the goals of the gym, the staff or resources available, the gymnasts within the gym, other programs within the gym, space available, and time of training.

I suggest that people focus on the principles, and then mold it to what fits in their gym based on all these factors. Here are some questions to work through for strength and conditioning planning.

REMEMBER – All of the following content, slides, and templates are available for free download. There is also a 90-minute free lecture video I filmed that you can find here.

What are the multi-year goals of our gym?

    • Youth recreational level or noncompetitive gymnastics
    • Youth semi-competitive gymnastics
    • Adult recreational gymnastics
    • Youth compulsory level competition
    • Youth optional level competition
    • Youth excel level competition
    • Provide youth with collegiate gymnastics opportunities
    • Provide youth with elite, national, or international level gymnastics opportunities

Individual Year Goal

Based on the outlined multiyear goals, what should the individual training year look like? What are the individual yearly goals?

    • When is the most important competition?
    • States, regionals, or nationals for most competitive levels
    • May be different for college or elite gymnasts

Multiple Month Block Goal

By working backward from the season peak, how many months are designated for each training block of the season?

    • How much time is needed to perfect routines, taper, and peak for championship meet season – Competitive Season B
    • How much time is needed to train and compete for routines in the non-championship meet season – Competitive Season A
    • How much time is needed to prepare for the start of competition season – Pre-Season B
    • How much time is needed to transition from offseason training to preseason training – Pre-Season A
    • How much time in offseason to learn new skills, drills, do strength and general energy systems training – Non-Competitive Off Season
    • How much time is needed for complete deloaded training following previous competitive season – Deload Recovery

**An Important Point Moving Forward**

In the initial planning stage of the training year, I recommend people go backward from the peak competition. This approach is to help look at yearly, monthly, and weekly goals.

Once this yearly plan is outlined, I find it more helpful to work forwards from the rest period following a competition season, moving into the next training year. I think following chronological order allows everyone involved to see the logical progression of training and helps to build specific programs more effectively.

For this reason, for the remainder of this explanation, I will be moving forward in the year starting from the rest period (Deload) and ending with the peak competition (Competitive Season B). Keep this in mind, or it may feel a little confusing.

Please also keep in mind, this is just an example of my experiences. I primarily work in a competitive team setting for women’s compulsory and optional levels. This will look different for other variants of gymnastics including excel, high school, college, elite, men’s compulsory or optional gymnastics, as well as any other levels or age groups.

Given the training blocks (month or multi-month), what is the main goal of training during this time?

Monthly Block Goals

For all gymnastics programs, I follow four main subcomponents to training as you will see in the chart.

  1. Gymnastics Specific – actual gymnastics skill development, technical drills or progressions, routines, meet preparation, etc.
  2. Strength, Power, and Flexibility – physical preparation subset training
  3. Energy Systems –metabolic pathway training
  4. Athlete Wellness –overall athlete physical, mental, and emotional well being

(Remember now starting from the end of the competitive year and moving forward to build training year plan, and it will be based on the U.S. Competitive calendars)


Monthly Block 1 – Deload / Recovery (Typically May into June, then June/July/Aug)

Deload/Recovery  – 2 week rest + 2 week slow ramping

    • Gymnastics Specific –
      • Complete rest for two weeks
      • Followed by two weeks of skill basics, shaping, soft impact, dance, choreography
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Complete rest for two weeks
      • Followed by basic strength exercises, shaping, flexibility and education about the first training block for any new movements or exercises
    • Energy Systems –
      • Complete rest for two weeks
      • Followed by basic aerobic fitness, soft impact
      • Education about the first training block for new movements or exercises
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Full movement screens
      • Referral to proper medical care for resolution of injuries from last season
      • Education to athletes about customized injury management and injury prevention program to be done in offseason
Monthly Block 2 = Non Competitive / Building

Non Competitive / Building Season –

    • Gymnastics Specific –
      • Identify the level of competition for next year o Education on new skill technique/drills
      • Acquisition of new skills
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Two weeks of strength and flexibility training to prepare the body for upcoming heavy training cycles
      • Followed by ten weeks of Max Strength, with a focus on General Physical Preparedness, and techniques to optimize flexibility for skills needed
      • Biases non-gymnastics strength but still trains essential gymnastics demands (handstands, presses, body weight core, basic shaping, etc.)
    • Energy Systems –
      • Two weeks of general anatomical adaptation
      • *Anatomical adaptation simply refers to a built-in the slow ramp-up period of a new program. It is more general preparation work, rather than heavy intensive loading, that allows athletes to learn the movement patterns first and perform them with high quality, before intensive training being prescribed.
      • Followed by ten weeks of Aerobic Conditioning/Anaerobic Conditioning blend in General Physical Preparedness context
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Continued resolution of injuries as needed
      • Ten weeks of human movement care
        Integrated preventative rehabilitation, athlete education, self-soft tissue care, recovery techniques, nutritional strategies, mental and emotional training
Monthly Block 3 – Pre-Season A (Sept/Oct/Nov)

Pre-Season A  – Transfer of Off Season Progress to Competition Training (Sept)

    • Gymnastics Specific –
      • Construction of basic routines
      • The movement to 3 skill combinations and half routines at the end of the training block o Generally, on softer surfaces or with harder new skills to a modified surface as needed
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Half maintenance care of Max Strength, half transfer of Max Strength Phase to general
      • Power and Rate of Force Development Phase.
      • Introducing more plyometric, fast twitch exercises and power emphasis o Incorporates both gymnastics specific and non-gymnastics exercises
    • Energy Systems –
      • Transfer of general aerobic/anaerobic base to general anaerobic fitness
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Increase in recovery education, implementation, and strict monitoring of work to rest
      • ratios to avoid injury onset typical to preseason training
Monthly Block 4 – Pre-Season B

Pre-Season B – (2 months, typically Oct/Nov) Preparation for Competition Season

    • Gymnastics Specific –
      • Movement from half routines to full routines
      • Adjustment of basic routines as needed
      • By the end of training block simulating pressure sets/ competition environments
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Biases focus on body weight Explosive Power, Rate of Force Development, and gymnastics
      • specific body weight exercises
      • Regular active flexibility and optimization of hip/shoulder motion for skills
    • Energy Systems –
      • Biases focus on gymnastics specific anaerobic fitness typically through interval training with one day of active aerobic recovery
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Regular screening for losses of range of motion through soft tissue adaptations,
      • Maintenance care of accessory strength and balance, mental and emotional health, recovery/nutrition habits, and stress management strategies for the upcoming season
Monthly Block 6 – Competitive Season A (Dec/Jan/Feb)

Competitive Season A – Start to Middle of Competition Season.

    • Gymnastics Specific
      • Focuses on full routines, pressures sets, and planning training weeks for competition settings
      • Evolution of routines to add new skills as appropriate in advanced routines
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Focuses on continued Explosive Power and Rate of Force Development, but begins to become more maintenance care of adaptations rather than sustained overload o Maintenance of flexibility and focus on transfer to skills and routines
    • Energy Systems –
      • Focuses on continued gymnastics specific anaerobic capacity with aerobic recovery as needed, but begins to become more maintenance care of adaptations rather than continued overload
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Hypervigilance to start with injuries, maintenance care for physical/emotional/psychological wellness
      • Education on strategies for peaking during next block of the championship season
Monthly Block 7 – Competitive Season B (2 months, typically March/April/May)

Competition Season B – Peaking for End of Competition Season

    • Gymnastics Specific –
      • Focus on advanced routines as appropriate, % of hit routines, planning training weeks around peaking at championship meets
    • Strength, Power, and Flexibility –
      • Maintenance care for strength and power adaptations focus on routines and competitions o Continued maintenance of flexibility for routines
    • Energy Systems –
      • Maintenance care, focus on routines and competitions
    • Athlete Wellness –
      • Increased focus on physical, mental, and psychological recovery as well as training to handle peak competitions

Weekly Training Blocks

Starting with this information above, we begin to see how the entire year can be broken up into smaller multi-month components based on the training goals, and adaptations intended. From here, we move on to individual months of training.

Keep in mind; you do not always need to plan in 1-month increments. I often plan for 6-week blocks to better fit the meet season schedule. It all depends on the goal of training, and how long it may take to see adaptations or progress with skills, strength, flexibility, or energy systems training.

Start to consider: Given the broader goals of each month, the athlete level, the age of the athlete, and how many hours of training per week, what will a monthly program design and work to rest ratio look like?

Out Of Season Example:

    • Week 1 – Building Week
    • Week 2 – Building Week
    • Week 3 – Building Week
    • Week 4 – De Load Week

In Season Example

    • Week 1 – Building Week
    • Week 2 – Meet Week
    • Week 3 – 1⁄2 Recovery 1⁄2 Building Week
    • Week 4 – Meet Week

From the single month or six-week increment, we then move to plan single training weeks.

Single Week Training Block

What will an individual weekly program design look like? Take into consideration, the more significant goals of the week (meet week vs. building week vs. recovery week), how many days/hours of training, the athlete level, and time in the season. What will the work to rest ratios and intensity modulation look like?

    • Monday – Heavy Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • Full Event Training Workload
      • Strength
        • Full Strength Day 1 Workload
      • Energy Systems
        • Full Energy Day 1 Workload
      • Athlete Wellness
        • Athlete Recovery Time at the end of Practice (Soft Tissue, Stretching, etc.)
    • Tuesday – Light Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • Drills, Technique, Skills to Soft Surface or Pit
      • Strength
        • Shaping, Technique, Injury Prevention Programs
      • Energy Systems
        • None or Light Aerobic Recovery
      • Athlete Wellness
        • Athlete Recovery Time at the end of Practice (Soft Tissue, Stretching, etc.)
    • Wednesday – Medium Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • Full Event Training Day 1 Workload
      • Strength
        • Full Strength Day 2 or
        •  Full Energy Systems Day 2 or o Medium of Both
      • Energy Systems
        • Full Strength Day 2 or
        • Full Energy Systems Day 2 or
        • Medium of Both
      • Athlete Wellness
        • No Blocks Outlined Specifically
    • Thursday – Off Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Strength
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Energy Systems
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Athlete Wellness
        • Recovery at Home
    • Friday – Medium Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • Full Event Training Workload
      • Strength
        • Full Strength Day 3 or
        • Full Energy Systems Day 3 or
        • Medium of Both
      • Energy Systems
        • Full Strength Day 3 or
        • Full Energy Systems Day 3 or o Medium of Both
      • Athlete Wellness
        • No Blocks Outlined Specifically
    • Saturday – Heavy Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • Full Event Training Day 4 Workload
      • Strength
        • Full Strength Day 4 Workload
      • Energy Systems
        • Full Energy Day 4 Workload
      • Athlete Wellness –
        • Athlete Recovery Time at End of Practice (Soft Tissue, Stretching, etc)
    • Sunday – Off Day
      • Gymnastics Specific
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Strength
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Energy Systems
        • None, Recovery at Home
      • Athlete Wellness
        • Recovery at Home

Remember that I am working off of 5 day program model above, but you can adjust or any number of working days. Here is a graph for this

Individual Practice Plans

Keeping with the trend, we then move from the training week to plan for the individual practice or training unit.

Next, what will the individual training days look like? Consider, the broader goals of the week, how many hours of training will occur, the scheduled events, the athlete level, and time in the season,

Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Example

WAG Practice Schedule

    • Monday – Heavy
      • Warm Up
      • Vault
      • Bars
      • Beam
      • Strength
      • Energy Systems
      • Cool Down
    • Tuesday – Light
      • Warm Up
      • Bars
      • Beam
      • Floor Choreography/Dance
      • Shaping, PreHab
      • Aerobic Recovery
      • Flexibility
    • Wednesday -Medium
      • Warm Up
      • Vault
      • Beam
      • Bars
      • Strength or Energy Systems
    • Thursday – Off
      • None
    • Friday – Medium
      • Warm Up
      • Floor
      • Bars
      • Vault
      • Strength or Energy Systems
    • Saturday – Heavy
      • Warm Up Beam
      • Vault
      • Floor
      • Energy Systems
      • Flexibility Cool Down
    • Sunday – Off
      • None
Men’s Artistic Gymnastics Example

MAG Practice Schedule

    • Monday – Heavy
      • Warm Up
      • Floor
      • Pommels
      • Rings
      • Strength
      • Energy Systems
      • Cool Down
    • Tuesday – Light
      • Warm Up
      • Pommels
      • Light Ring Strength/Shaping
      • Shaping, Drills, Pre-Hab
      • Aerobic Recovery
      • Flexibility
    • Wednesday -Medium
      • Warm Up
      • Vault
      • Parallel Bars
      • High Bar
      • Strength or Energy Systems
    • Thursday – Off
      • None
    • Friday – Medium
      • Warm Up
      • Floor
      • Pommels
      • Rings
      • Strength or Energy Systems
    • Saturday – Heavy
      • Warm Up Beam
      • Vault
      • Parallel Bars
      • High Bar
      • Energy Systems
      • Flexibility Cool Down
    • Sunday – Off
      • None

Individual Training Event/Section Assignments

Now from the individual training day, we can then plan out specific event assignments, training loads, strength programs, flexibility assignments, energy systems workouts, or instructional time blocks.

What will the actual assignment or workout look like? Take into consideration, the larger goals of the event, strength session, energy systems training session, or flexibility training session.

I will include a picture of an individual workout taken from our strength program, but will go into this much more in depth in the last piece of the chapter above.

Strength and Metabolic Program Design Example

We will continue this last step in a more detailed approach, as this relates to writing daily strength programs.

Strength Exercise Examples

So far, I have covered a much larger overview into how I approach gymnastics program design. It also builds in a lot of the current science on periodization, work to rest ratios, and overall holistic long-term athletic development.

When we zoom in all the way down to the individual training level, there is a massive amount of variability that comes into play with regards to gymnastics specific training load. The warm-ups, skills, drills, progressions, and routine assignments have infinite possibilities due to the nature of gymnastics.

The second most common question I get following, “I like these concepts, where do I start,” is “okay what exercises should I use, and how many of them should we do.”

One important caveat to this question; just as there is a need to individualize skill training to a gymnast, there is a need to individualize strength, flexibility, and energy systems training to a gymnast. Every athlete is different. Despite there being solid foundational principles of both skill training and strength training, not every gymnast will take the same path to reach their end goal.

With this in mind, I always respond first to the question of “what exercises should I use, and how many should I have athletes do” with “it depends.” This answer is not to dodge the question, but more rather be honest and transparent.

When a gymnast tries to learn a giant, there are foundational principles they need to master (body tension, proper cast handstand, tap swing mechanics, timing, etc.). However, there may be different coaching cues, drills, shaping corrections, and troubleshooting thoughts for each athlete.

The same goes for strength program design. When a gymnast tries to get a stronger lower body, there are certain foundational principles they need to master (core control, body weight squat and hinge patterns, holding load correctly, breathing, body tension, etc). But just like with skills, there may be different coaching cues, regressions or progressions, and modifications they may need to master the exercise. Some common changes include different exercise selections based on anatomy, sets, reps, and total volume for specific exercises.

Just as athletes have individual strengths or areas for improvement on specific skills or events, they also have individual strengths or areas for improvement in their physical preparation programs. We must apply the principles of scientific strength and conditioning, but also use the art of coaching to make sure we are molding to the needs of our gymnasts.

Keep this in mind as you read. I am happy to offer my thoughts and suggestions. But in reality, when working with gymnasts both coaching or in the rehab setting, I am always tweaking things on the fly as needed to fit their personal needs best.

Once you get down to the weekly and daily creation of actual strength programs, I think it’s best to break things into basic movements of the human body. For strength programming, below are the movement categories I have been taught to use with regards to the upper body, lower body, and core. Here is a sumary graph of this I made.

Each category is followed by gymnastics bodyweight exercise examples (SPP) and non-gymnastics exercise examples (GPP) examples. Remember GPP stands for “General Physical Preparedness,” and SPP stands for “Specific Physical Preparedness.”

I am going to limit the number of videos included for the ease of following along, but keep in mind almost every exercise here can be found either through the text books offered or on my Youtube Page (click here for full library).

General Strength / Non-Gymnastics Strength

General Strength – Upper Body

  • Horizontal Push
      • Push Ups, Dumbbell Floor Press


  • Horizontal Pull
      • Feet Elevated Rows, Renegade Row, Band Pull Aparts


    • Vertical Push
        • 1/2 Kneeling Dumbell Press, Landmine Press


  • Vertical Pull
        • 1/2 Kneeling Band Pull Down, Cable Pull Down


  • Dynamic Stability
      • Overhead or 90-90 Carry, Turkish Get Up


  • Isolated Muscular Development / Accessory Movement 
      • Sidelying External Rotation, Prone T/Y/U Complex, Standing Full Can

General Strength – Core

  • Anti Extension
    • Front Plank, Dead Bug, Sled Push


  • Anti Flexion
    • Reverse Plank, Sled Pull


  • Anti Side Bend
    • Suitcase Carry, Lateral Sled Drag


  • Anti Rotation
    • Kettlebell Drag Through, Anti Rotation Press


  • Anti Compression
    • Farmer Carry, Plyometrics

General Strength –  Lower Body

  • Squat
    • Goblet Squat


  • Hinge
    • Kettle Bell Deadlift, Double or Single Leg Hip Lift


    • Split Pelvis
      • Split Squats, Rear Foor/Front Foot Elevated Split Squats

  • Single Leg
    • Single Leg Squat, Single Leg Hip Lift,  Single Leg Romanian Deadlift

  • Dynamic Stability
    • Sideways Medball Throw at Wall, Single-Leg Balance Drills on Foam


  • Isolated Muscular Development / Accessory Work
    • Direct Hamstring Training (Physioball Curl In)
    • Clamshells, Side Leg Lifts, Side Band Walks


Gymnastics Specific Strength

Despite gymnasts getting massive benefits from general athletic strength, it is absolutely crucial that gymnasts are doing sport-specific strength every day. Gymnastics is an extremely unique sport, and because of that we can not forget how important things like handstand training, presses, rope climbs, core development, shaping, and specific bounding or stiffness drills are.

In my experience personally and having consulted with 100s of gymnastics programs, the combination of these two things can create incredibly results for strength, power, technical development, and performance. I have taken these categories from my observations and coaching experiences, but also from learning from amazing coaches. I highly suggest people check out Nick Ruddock for more on this topic.

Also remember, some of these start to blur the lines between strength and power training (coming in next section). This is okay, we just always have to remember the bigger picture about the number of impacts we are subjecting young athletes too. It’s very easy to get carried away with drill training, gymnastics strength, and lower body plyometrics. Suddenly you look back and there have been 1000s of impacts in a few weeks, and growth plate issues like Sever’s Disease, OsGood Schlatters, and Gymnast’s Wrist occur.

Or in older athletes issues like stress fractures, elbow/knee OCD, and tendon pain. More on programming below, but keep this in mind as you start to brainstorm implementation.

Gymnastics Specific Categories and Examples

  • Line Tension
    • Stomach
    • Back
    • Standing
    • Hanging
    • Handstand


  • Handstand
    • Wall Facing Bent Knee Handstand


  • Pressing
    • Press Walks Front/Back


  • Rope Climb
    • Seated –> With Legs –>No Leg Progressions


  • Shoulder Opening
    • Elastic Band Opens At Wall


  • Shoulder Closing
    • Elastic Band Hollow Closes on Ground (same exercise as above just body is turned 180 degrees)


  • Shoulder Blade Elevation/Depression
    • Tall Kneeling Shoulder Elevation


  • Shoulder Blade Protraction/Retraction
    • Springboard / Trampoline / Floor Push Up Bounces


  • Hollow Shape
    • Uppers, Lowers, Togethers
    • Tuck – One Leg – Arch – Hollow Progressions


  • Arch Shape
    • Uppers, Lowers, Togethers
    • Tuck – One Leg – Arch Progressions


  • Shape Changing / Korbet Action
    • Suspension Drill Between Rollers/Blocks
    • Arch Hollow Snaps Back/Stomach
    • Arch Hollow Snaps Hanging
    • Arch Hollow Snap in Handstand


  • L – Hold / Leg Lifting / Compression
    • Tuck Up, One Leg Up, Bottom 90, Full Leg Lift, Top 90 Lift


  • Lower Body Stiffness / Bounding
    • In and Out Panel Jumps
    • Handstand Snap Down Progressions


    • Upper Body Stiffness / Bounding
      • Jump Cast Handstand Drills / Handstand Pops on Tramp / Tumbl Trak / Floor

  • Women’s Specific Strength
    • Balance Beam foot/ankle strength for reliving
    • Active hip flexibility

  • Men’s Specific Strength
    • Dip swing development
    • Shoulder hyperextension strength (pommel swing, parallel bar swing, ring dislocates)
    • Ring strength
    • Weight bearing wrist strength (pommels)

This is not an exhaustive list. There are hundreds of exercises that can be programmed into a training routine. There are also multiple combinations and variable categories available in the literature. This is only the tip of the iceberg.

How to Build Strength Plans

To get started, consider the categories themselves and try to organize exercises based on the movement or muscles involved. In general, approaching the body based on movements is more practical for planning, but there are certainly many times where individual isolated muscle strengthening is essential.

Also, I understand the lower body can be confusing. The most important aspect to the lower body is that we are programming equally if not more posterior chain work (glutes in all planes, hamstrings, deep hip rotators) to the commonly overdeveloped anterior chain (quads, inner thigh or adductors, hip flexors). Gymnastics places a huge demand on the lower body, and it must be trained appropriately with equal balance in all motions.

If you want a complete overview of off season training program design, you can check out this video tutorial I did with my buddy Kiefer Lammi. These same concepts apply when moving into the season. We talk about global programming concepts, how we approach programming for a week, and how we divide up what exercises to do each day.

The most significant take away here is not to try and find the best exercise for a gymnast’s strength program. It is more to make sure everyone is categorizing, planning, and tracking the types of exercises in their strength programs to keep the gymnasts’ body balanced. Once you understand global categories of exercises, you have the building blocks to start creating a strength program.

To help create a well-balanced offseason where general strength is the emphasis, I try to have each category of the upper body, the lower body, and the core represented. I then add in gymnastics specific essentials like handstands, presses, men’s ring shoulder strength and women’s beam/floor hip strength.

Combining my personal experience with what I have learned from others, I like to bias upper body gymnastics shaping basics, upper body horizontal pulling (for scap strength), local hip work that targets the glutes as well as deep hip rotators, and extra core work. I find they are typically overlooked and the lowest hanging fruit for improvement as well as injury prevention.

Sets and Repetitions

There are many different schools of thought on how to plan sets, reps, and overall volume of strength exercises. Once again, “it depends” is my most honest answer. You can follow guidelines, but when it comes down to it you have to think critically about the context. 3 sets of 10 squats may be perfectly fine, while 3 sets of 10 feet elevated split squats might be brutal on the athlete.

Also, you must factor in other considerations such as

  • Age and development of the athlete
  • Gymnastics training age (number of years in gymnastics) and lifting training age (number of years using external load)
  • Quality of movement
  • Fatigue levels
  • Time of season and proximity of competitions
  • Goals of the specific block, goals of the entire year

The number of exercises to use, the sets, repetitions, amount of rest in between sets, and the times per week for individual exercises is highly variable. I hope the sections above have highlighted the need for gymnastics to embrace working with well-qualified strength and conditioning coaches.

Here are some general guidelines

    • Strength – 3-4 sets of 8-12 repetitions
      • as load increases, sets and reps generally decrease depending on the goal
    • Power – 2-5 sets of 3-7 reps depending on the exercise
      • sets and reps generally decrease and intensity increases, maximal loading also generally decreses as speed increases
    • Plyometrics – large variety based on the goal, # of ground contacts, and intensity
      • Program by the number of ground contacts (3×10 panel mat jumps = 30 contacts) and the intensity (low, medium, high)
    • Gymnastics Specific Strength – large variety based on exericse, time vs reps, and age of athlete

Given this, I personally use a variety of approaches, but mainly design couplets or triples for exercises. I also may use circuits during certain parts of the season.

A straight set is when all the sets and repetitions of one exercise are done consecutively. Say a 5×5 squat or deadlift

  • 1A – 5×5 Goblet Squat
  • Athlete performs 5 goblet squats, then rests, then 5 more goblet squats, then rests, and so on

A couplet or superset is when two exercises are alternated.

  • 1A – 5×5 Goblet Squat
  • 1B – 4×7 Push Up
  • Athlete performs 5 goblet squats, 7 push ups, back to 5 goblet squats, 7 push ups, and so on

A triplet is when three exercises are programmed together, working from one to the next to the next.

  • 1A – 5×5 Goblet Squat
  • 1B – 4×7 Push Ups
  • 1C – 4×10 Hollow Rocks
  • Athlete performs 5 goblet squats, then 7 push ups, then 10 hollow rockers, then 5 goblet squats, and so on.

Circuit training is when a group fo exercises are done in a cycle, either by repetitions or by time domains.

  • 4 Rounds – 45 seconds of work, 15 seconds or rest/transition for the following exercise.
    • Goblet Squats
    • Push Ups
    • Hollow Rocks
    • Broad Jumps
    • Rope Climbs
    • Arch Rocks
    • Athletes move through on a timer for a total of 24 minutes

This picture below from our strength program has a triplet (1A/1B/1C), followed by a doublet (2A/2B), and then another double (3A/3B).


I find that in a group setting with a lot of athletes and limited time, working in this fashion of couplets and triples is the best way to dose our athletes optimally. The main exercise can be followed by a secondary exercise or accessory exercise in most cases. It also helps with organization and the ability to adjust programs as needed. Personally, I find it less stressful to program in this way to make sure all the exercises that need to be done are in place.

There are times when focusing on the strength we may start a program with a single exercise, such as 5×5 of goblet squats, to focus on the effort in a single exercise with appropriate rest. However, this is quite rare.

It is beyond the scope of this book to really outline every concept of set, repetition, rest, or intensity for each exercise. The chapters on strength program design, periodization, and exercise prescription found in the resources sections have entire chapters dedicated to this concept for readers to investigate.

Progressing Strength Programs Week to Week

To practically apply this information, each athlete in our gym has their own binder with printed out sheets for each week, month, and block for strength assignments. I create the programs in advanced based on level, and then each athlete has their copy. This approach allows them to check off sets and reps, write down weights or level of resistance bands used, record changes in exercises for individuality, or to jot down general notes.

We chose to use binders because as a gym, we firmly believe in athletes taking autonomy in their own training. Strength programs are a valuable time to foster this discovery. This also provides a source of objective tracking for each athlete, to reflect upon when positive or negative bumps in the road occur. We keep a global spreadsheet of all the months of training on our wall, so coaches and athletes are in the loop.

Just as the season progresses from general strength to more power-based exercises, now I will cover some exercise examples for this category.


Power Exercise Examples

Power training is intended to use the baseline levels of strength present and teach the neuromuscular system to produce force rapidly. This adaptation is accomplished through adaptations in the mechanical, neurological, and energy systems within the muscular tissue.

Primarily, we are helping muscles learn to turn on very quickly, activate their motor units, produce considerable amounts of force, and transfer/absorb energy. Building off the strength section, I wanted to include some examples for power or rate of force development exercises. Many of these are commonly used in gymnastics, while some are more nontraditional exercises not widely used.

Following a strength cycle, I typically like to start gymnasts with more challenging versions of power exercises where they are only able to use specific body segments (arms or legs) vs. their entire body.

As an example, if the lower body is the focus, I may have athletes place their arms across their chest during squat jumps from a box, so they cannot use their arms to swing and assist. If the upper body is the focus, I may have athletes sit down when doing overhead medball throws so they cannot use their legs to assist.

Although this typically does not look nearly as impressive in relation to power output, it helps significantly narrow in training to the specific body parts intended. Then, as a progression or within another training cycle, exercises can be progressed to involve the whole body or be more dynamic.

From a physiological point of view, we are theoretically aiming to activate the local motor units within a muscle group, enhance their rate coding or discharge frequency, and encourage disinhibition to create more force output. We are also looking to encourage local muscle architecture changes and improve metabolic pathways to support the work output. As each piece is optimized, it then can be added to more whole-body progressions that encourage energy storage and transfer throughout the entire body.

I will outline the power exercise examples in this fashion. You will also see the categories for the lower body broken down into vertical force (jumping for height) and horizontal force (sprinting speed).

Lower Body

  • Local without arm swings
      • Vertical force
        • Double leg and single-leg squat jumps from a block, arms across the chest for no counter swing
        • Low height box jumps (must land in proper squat position) starting from a seated position with arms across the chest
        • Speed deadlifts (although arguably arm involvement and horizontal force)
        • Speed cable or band pull through (although arguably arm involvement and horizontal force)

      • Horizontal force
        • Double leg or single-leg hip lift jumps with upper back on a block, and opposite knees hugged to the chest to limit arm assistance or lower back hyperextension
        • Explosive sled pushes with only legs, arms outstretched in a static position
        • Explosive sled pulls with only legs (strap around the waist), arms across chest
        • Double leg broad jumps front and sideways, arms across the chest for no counter swing

  • Adding arms and upper body
    • Vertical Force
      • Double leg and single leg squat jumps from a block, arm swing and trunk lean allowed
      • Moderate height box jumps (must land in proper squat position) arm swing and a trunk lean allowed

    • Horizontal force
        • Double leg or single leg hip lift jumps with upper back on block arm swing and trunk lean allowed
        • Kettlebell swings, arm swing and trunk lean allowed
        • Double leg broad jumps front and sideways, arm swing and trunk lean allowed
        • Explosive sled pushes or pulls with leg and arm drive
        • Overhead medball throws and slams from a static start

  • Adding whole body, external load, or energy storage
          • Vertical Force
            • Candle stick roll to double leg and single leg squat jumps off panel mat using arms
            • Multiple bounding double leg or single leg squat jumps
            • Multiple bounding body tension jumps to panel mats of blocks
            • Tuck or other jumps over blocks/hurdles
            • Light weights or weight vest additions as appropriate
            • Battling rope slams and jumps
            • Higher level kettlebell, Olympic Weight Lifting, or jumping drills
            • Moderate height double box jumps focusing on minimal ground contact
            • Depth jumps from blocks with forwarding, vertical, or lateral broad jump(  must land in proper squat position) using arm swing and trunk lean allowed
            • Full overhead medball throws and slams

      • Horizontal Force
        • Advanced gymnastics jump or leap drills
        • Multiple double legs or single-leg hip lift jumps with upper back on a block
        • Kettlebell swings (Russian style)
        • Bounding broad jumps or depth jumps
        • Multiple double leg broad jumps front and sideways, arms and trunk lean allowed
        • Full body sled pushes and pulls
        • Sprinting drills
        •  Higher-level kettlebell, Olympic Weight Lifting, or jumping drills

Upper Body

  • Local without leg use

    • Vertical Force
      • Medball overhead in a seated position to partner
      • Seated overhead handstand shrugs against a wall
      • Seated battling rope slams
      • Speed pull-ups or rope climbs with no leg use
      • Seated weight pulls with towing rope
      • Seated overhead medball throws
      • Seated battling rope waves

    • Horizontal Force
          • Medball chest passes on back to partner
          • Medball chest passes to a wall in a seated position
          • Push up shape bounces on knees, trampoline, springboard, or floor
          • Speed horizontal rows, legs on a block
          • Seated sled pulls with towing rope

  • Adding legs and lower body
    • Vertical Force
          • Medball overhead in a standing position to partner
          • Handstand shape bounces on a tramp, springboard, or floor
          • Tall kneeling or half kneeling battling rope slams
          • Tall kneeling medball slams and overhead throws
          • Speed pull-ups or rope climbs with no leg use
          • Tall kneeling battling rope waves
          • Kneeling medball slams

    • Horizontal Force
            • Medball chest passes to a wall in tall kneeling position for hip extension power
            • Push up shape bounces on the floor, on feet
            • Speed horizontal rows, feet on a block
            • Tall kneeling and half kneeling sled pulls with rope
            • Seated sprinting drills


  • Adding whole body, or energy storage
    • Vertical Force
        • Advanced gymnastics shaping drills
        • Speed handstand push-ups
        • Speed pull-ups and rope climbs
        • Medicine ball squat thruster with a throw
        • Multiple standing overhead medball throws and slams
        • Higher level kettlebell, Olympic Weight Lifting, or jumping drills Battling rope slams and jumps

    • Horizontal Force
          • Advanced gymnastics shaping drills
          • Pushups with hop
          • Speed horizontal rows with a weight vest
          • Sled pull with a horizontal row with ropes standing
          • Medball chest pass with step
          • Medball overhead throw with step
          • Explosive sled pushes, full sled pushes and pulls
          • Sprinting drills
          • Higher-level kettlebell, Olympic Weight Lifting, or jumping drills


    • Local without arm or leg use
      • Many great gymnastics shaping drills, from a static position
      • Basic body tension drills
      • Basic core control activation drills in various positions (on back, on stomach, hanging, etc.)

    • Adding arms and legs
      • Arch hollow snaps hanging
      • Arch hollow snap medicine ball throws
      • Rotational medicine ball scoop throws
      • Side to side overhead medball slams
      • Side to side battling rope jump and slams o Explosive chops and lifts in half kneeling

    • Adding whole body, or energy storage
      • Advanced tumbling, vaulting, or bar drills
      • Sideways shuffle to rotational medball throws o Reactive medball scoop throws to wall
      • Reactive overhead medball catch and throws o Kettlebell swings
      • Sled pushing, pulling and sideways dragging
      • Sprinting drills

Plyometric Exercise Examples

Just as with the section above, I know there are hundreds of other creative power, rate of force development, or explosive exercises that could go into these categories. These are just a few examples of what I have found beneficial. I again suggest readers take the principles and mold them into what they see helpful or best fitting to the athletes they train.

I mentioned in the section above that for the reasons related to the muscle and neural adaptation to strength training; I usually like to do plyometric and power exercises following strength block cycles. With that said, there will always be some degree of plyometric training occurring in gymnastics due to the nature of the sport and skill training.

There is a surplus of quality low, medium, and high-intensity plyometric exercises that can benefit a gymnast during strength programs. I will also include links to articles on these ideas below. Here are some of my “go to” exercises, keeping in mind many of the moderate to higher energy exercises overlap into the power section above. For this sake, I won’t repeat them.

Low Energy

    • Lower Body Examples
      • Small hops in place, one and two-legged
      • Jump roping in place
      • Traveling jump roping forwards, backward
      • Side to side, front to back, lateral, and multi-directional hops
      • Quick taps to small mat front to back, plate hops up and down, side to sideline mini hops
      • Skipping and hopping progressions


    • Upper Body Examples
      • Push up hops on tramopline or springboard
      • Handstand bounces on trampoline
      • Overhead shaping arch – hollow snaps

    • Core Examples
      • Tigth arch hollow snaps, many vaulting and sprinting drills
      • Chest and Overhead Medball bounces


Moderate Energy

  • Lower Body Examples
    • Panel mat two feet and one foot bounces, up and down
    • Moderate height straight, tuck, and leaps in place
    • Depth drops, reactive depth jumps, and two-foot bounding


  • Upper Body Examples
    • Plyometric push-ups (floor or between elevated surfaces)
    • One-handed and two-handed medball bounces, throws, catches
    • Seated battling rope slams and waves
    • Seated medball rebounds overhead or chest passes

  • Core
      • Ballistic medball chops and lifts (without throwing/release)
      • One-handed and two-handed medball bounces, throws, catches
      • Seated battling rope slams and waves
      • Seated medball rebounds overhead or chest passes

High Energy

    • Lower Body Examples
          • Single leg jumping lunges, split squat jumps
          • Tuck jumps, straight jumps over blocks or hurdles
          • Double leg and single leg depth jumps to rebound jumps
          • Double and triple box jumps, double and single leg variations
          • Double and triple broad jumps, double and single leg variations
          • Punching and bounding tumbling drills

    • Upper Body Examples
      • Plyometric pushups with hops
      • Explosive medball slams with rebound and catch
      • Explosive battling rope slams and waves with the whole body o Swinging and shape-changing bar drills

    • Core Examples
      • Advanced gymnastics shaping, swinging, or jumping drills
      • Explosive medball slams with rebound and catch
      • Reactive medball catch and throws
      • Advanced kettlebell, dumbbell, Olympic lifting, or medball drills
      • Drills in above upper and lower section

Dosage and volume of plyometrics training are commonly decided based on the intensity (low, medium, high), the number of ground contacts made, and if bodyweight or external loading is used.

For those interested, page 322 of the Jeffreys and Moody Strength text offers an excellent outline of periodization of plyometrics throughout the competitive season. Although it is not specific to gymnastics, the principles can be beneficial for organizing the framework of training.

Despite the variability, plyometrics can be roughly calculated and tracked to reduce the risk of sudden spikes in training volume. This can be helpful to reduce the risk of growth plate and tendon irritation that is common in many young gymnasts.

We often see programs throw a ton of running or plyometrics at gymnasts after watching their gymnastics and deciding they are not “fast enough.” While I respect the observation and connection to changing training, we must be cautious not to throw a ton of high intensity plyometric at athletes aggressively.

It may not show problems in the short term, but I commonly see a week or two into the addition of high volume plyometrics (numbers or intensity) many athletes start to complain of pain in their feet, shins, knees, hips or lower back. Monitoring the number, and slowly ramping up from low ground contacts or intensity to moderate, to high, can be very helpful to prevent this from occurring in young athletes. We also must make sure athletes are closely monitored for fatigue, as not to let their quality of movement dissipate.

Concluding Thoughts

Keep in mind; there is no “right” strength program design or periodization style for strength, power, or plyometrics training outside safety and common sense. I have seen many different programs and approaches to periodization be successful over the last ten years of working in gymnastics. Where people fall apart is the background education, studying the science, planning, consistency, and exercise technique.

The key factor to all of this is people planning the global training program, understanding basic concepts of exercise categories and including some form of periodization or overload followed by rest. From here, it just requires consistently doing physical preparation with the quality of movement as the priority, with a sprinkle of patience from both coaches and gymnasts.

It is tempting to keep changing the exercises or adding new ideas. While this is good to maintain variety and prevent the monotony of training, I urge readers to balance this with sufficient time and consistency in physical preparation to see positive progress.

I personally aim to change conditioning every 4 – 6 weeks based on the progressions and time of the season. If this is done well with a supportive approach, a growth mind set, and a positive culture, there are no doubt gymnasts will positively respond.

As a concluding thought, remember that actual program design implementation and execution depends upon:

    • Training goals and age of athletes
    • Exercise knowledge of athlete and coaches
    • Time per day of strength programs (30 minutes, 60 minutes, etc.)
    • Days per week for strength programs (3x/week, 4x/week, 5x/week, etc.)
    • Equipment and staff Available
    • Time of season

As a general rule of thumb, I write programs to plan for future more complex exercises (speed rope climbs, plyometric push-ups, handstand push-ups, kettlebell swings, med ball throws). As for younger athletes, I feel they need to focus on doing the basics really well, consistently, and with good quality. It is the basics that prepare them for more complex exercises in the future. This refers to both essential gymnastics strength (shaping, core, handstands, presses, etc.) as well as essential non-gymnastics strength (squatting pattern, hinging pattern, dumbbell pressing mechanics, etc.). From this foundation of basic movement, core strength and control, and gymnastics technique, they are prepared to make significant progress down the road.

General preparation with a mix of gymnastics/non-gymnastics movements is the focus of offseason. I would say it’s a 50% – 50% mix during the summer. This is a valuable time to create a durable well- rounded athlete through the incorporation of weights, general movements, and more nontraditional exercises.

As the season progresses training transitions from general preparation too much more gymnastics specific preparation. Usually, once the season begins, we are doing all body weight and gymnastics specific exercises. The split of non-gymnastics to gymnastics strength and power is generally about 30% to 70%. Then finally, as the competitive season comes into full force, the ratio shifts to almost all gymnastics specific conditioning with a few foundational exercises (squat, deadlift, horizontal rowing in the upper body). The percentage becomes more 20% to 80%.

I feel this is the best way to help mold the athlete into higher performance and longevity. The cycle continues with postseason moving back to almost all general base work again.

Again, keep in mind this is just my approach to designing strength and power programs for gymnasts.
I have already outlined my approach to flexibility and will cover my thoughts on energy systems in the next chapter. Several other versions or approaches work effectively. I am continually learning more from literature, other coaches, and strength and conditioning friends. Even in the last five years, I have completely changed how I approach specific areas.

Please just think about the principles I have outlined, and how it best fits your athletes. Once you have covered this, sit with all the staff and brainstorm collaboratively on the best approach. Due to how crucial physical preparation is for gymnastics performance and overall health, we must be highly focused on improving this area of training.

The first few chapters covering fundamental values, forging a positive culture, flexibility methods, and this section on strength and conditioning evolution are areas that I feel can have the most substantial impact in gymnastics. We cannot be afraid to break from the mold of doing what we have always done in fear of the unknown or seeing something fail to work immediately.

We do not have to abandon the traditional models of gymnastics physical preparation. We just need to dissect the approaches to take with us what works, leave behind what does not, infuse the best available scientific methods/support, and collaborate with other disciplines to find the best approach.

The unbelievable amount of possible benefits to gymnasts is compelling. The massive impact an updated model of physical preparation can make on gymnasts’ health and performance is even more substantial.

I hope that this blog has helped summarize the very overwhelming, but crucial concepts related to strength, power, plyometrics, and periodization in gymnastics.


1. DiFiori JP., et al. Overuse Injuries and Burnout in Youth Sports: A Position Statement from the American Medical Society of Sports Medicine. Clin J Sport Med 2014; 24(1) : 3 – 20.

2. Bourdon PC., et al. Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement. IJSPP 2017, 12, S2- 161 – S2 – 170

3. Arnold A. Overuse Physeal Injuries in Youth Athletes: Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment Strategies. Sports Health. 2017. 9 (2) 139 – 147

4. Brenner JS. Overuse Injuries, Overtraining, and Burnout in Child and Adolescent Athletes. Pediatrics. 2007. 119 (6)

5. Paterno MV., et al. Prevention of Overuse Sports Injuries in the Young Athlete. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013. October 44(4) 553 – 564.

6. Bourdon PC, et al. Monitoring Athlete Training Loads: Consensus Statement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 7. 2017, 12, S2-161 -S2-170

7. Soligard T. et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581

8. Khan KM, Scott A. Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists’ prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:247-251. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054239

9. Subramanian A, Schilling TF. Tendon development and musculoskeletal assembly: emerging roles for the extracellular matrix development. 2015 Dec 15; 142(24): 4191-4204.

10. Rio E, Kidgell D, Moseley GL, et al. Tendon neuroplastic training: changing the way we think about tendon rehabilitation: a narrative review. Br J Sports Med Published Online First: 25 September 2015. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095215

11. Chen YT, Tenforde AS, Fredericson M. Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention. Curr Rev Musculoskeletal Med. 2013. 6:173-181

12. Behrens SB., et al. Stress Fractures of the Pelvis and Legs in Athletes: A Review. Sports Health. 5(2): 165 – 174

13. Astur DC, et al. Stress fractures: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia. 2016; 51(1) Jan – Feb, 3-10

14. Robertson GA, Wood AM. Lower limb stress fractures in sport: Optimising their management and outcome. World J Orthop. 2017. March 18(3): 242-255

15. Bompa, T., Buzzichelli C. Periodization for Sports Performance: 3rd Edition. Human Kinetics. 2015

16. Lorenz D., Morrison S. Current Concepts in Periodization of Strength and Conditioning for the Sports Physical Therapist. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Nov; 10(6): 734-747.

17. MacDougall D, Sale D. Other Considerations: Peaking, Tapering, and Overtraining. In The Physiology of Training for High Performance. London: Oxford Press. 2014 311-319

18. Haff GG. Periodization strategies for youth development. In Llyod RS, Oliver JL, Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 2014. Routledge: New York. 149-158

19. Meeisem R., De Pauw K. The Overtraining Syndrome (OTS). In Cardinale, M., Newton R., Nowsaka K. Strength and Conditioning Biological Principles and Practical Applications. Wiley- Blackwell. 2011: 243 – 252

20. Gabbet TJ. (2018) Workload monitoring and athlete management. In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. New York: Routledge

21. Turner A., Comfort P. (2018) Periodization. In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. New York: Routledge, 116 – 136

22. Haff GG. The essentials of periodization. In Jeffreys I, and Moody J. Strength and Conditioning for Sports Performance. 2016. New York: Routledge. 404-448

23. Gabbett TJ, The training – injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016. March, 50(5): 273 – 280

24. Gabbet TJ, Jenkins DG. Relationship between training load and injury in professional rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2011. May; 14(3): 204-209

25. Hulin BT, Gabbet TJ, Lawson DW, et al. The acute: chronic workload ratio predicts injury: high chronic workload may decrease injury risk in elite rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2016. Feb; 50(4): 231-236

26. Gabbett TJ, Nassis GP, Oetter E, et al. The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. Br J Sports Med Published Online First: 23 June 2017. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097298

27. Harris-Love MO., et al. Eccentric Exercise Program Design: A Periodization Model for Rehabilitation Applications. Front Physiol. 2017. 8: 112

28. Andrews, J., Reinold, M., Wilk, K. The Athlete’s Shoulder. Second Edition, 2009

29. Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Reinold MM. Nonoperative rehabilitation for traumatic and atraumatic glenohumeral instability. North Am J Sports Phys Ther 1(1):1631, 2006

30. Draovitch P, Edelstein J, KellyBT. The Layer Concept, Determing the Pain Generators, Pathology, and How Structure Determines Treatment. Cur Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012 Mar;5(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s1217801191058.

31. Shu B., Safran MR. Hip Instability: Anatomic and Clinical Considerations of Traumatic and Atraumatic Instability. Clin Sports Med 30 (2011) 349-367

32. Huang R, Diaz C, Parvizi J. Acetabular Labral Tears: Focused Review of Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Current Management . Phys Sportsmed. 2012 May;40(2):8793. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.05.1968.

33. McGill S., Low Back Disorders: Evidence-Based Prevention and Rehabilitation. 3nd Edition. 2016. Human Kinetics : Champaign, IL.

34. McGill S., Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance, 6th Edition. 2017. Human Kinetics: Champaign, Il.

35. DiFiori JP., et al. Wrist Pain, Distal Radial Physeal Injury, and Ulnar Variance in the Young Gymnast. 2006. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol 34(5). 840-849

36. Kajiyama S., et al. Osteochondritis Disseans of the Humeral Capitellum in Young Athletes : Comparison Between Baseball Players and Gymnasts. 2017. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5(3): 1-5

37. Podlogar T., Kolar J. Optimizing Hypertrophy for Gymnastics. Jan 2017. Conference paper. 108 – 120

38. Sands WA., McNeal JE., Jamni M., Delong TH. Should Gymnasts Life Weights? Sport Science. 2000.

39. Close GL, Morton JP. Developing Strength and Power. In Jeffreys I, and Moody J. Strength and Conditioning for Sports Performance. New York: Routledge. 230 – 260

40. Haff GG. Dispelling the myths of resistance training for youths. In Llyod RS, Oliver JL, Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 2014. Routledge: New York. 169 – 184

41. Suchomel TJ., Comfort P. (2018) Developing muscular strength and power. In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. New York: Routledge 13-38

42. MacDougall D, Sale D. Training for Strength, Power, Speed. In The Physiology of Training for High Performance. London: Oxford Press. 2014, 246 – 205

44. Podlogar T., Kolar J., Optimization of training for muscle hypertrophy and it’s implication into gymnastics. 2017. Conference Paper 108-120

45. Lloyd RS., et al. UKSCA Position Statement: Youth Resistance Training. UKSCA. 2012, 26 : 26 – 39

46. Faigenbaum AD. Strength Training for Children and Adolescents. In Cardinale, M., Newton R., Nowsaka K. Strength and Conditioning Biological Principles and Practical Applications. Wiley- Blackwell. 2011. 427 – 435

47. Dahab KS., and McCambridge TC.Strength Training in Children and Adolescents: Raising the Bar   for Young Athletes? Sports Health. 2009 May; 1(3): 223-226.

48. Laurensen JB., Bertelsen DM., Anderson LB. The effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 2014;48:871-877.

49. Lesinski M., Prieske O., Granacher U. Effect and dose-response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2016;50: 781-795.

50. Meyer GD., et al. Sports Specialization, Part I: Alternative Solutions to Early Sport Specialization in Youth Athletes. Sports Health. 2015; 8(1) : 65 – 73

51. Bergeron MF., Mountjoy M., Armstrong N., et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:843-851.

52. Valovich McLeod TC., et al. National Athletic Trainers Association Position Statement : Prevention of Pediatric Overuse Injuries. Journal of Athletic Training 2011;46(2):206-220

53. Lloyd RS., et al. Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 1: A Pathway for All Youth. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015. May; 29(5): 1439 – 1450

54. Lloyd RS., et al. Long-Term Athletic Development, Part 2: Barriers to Success and Potential Solutions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015. May; 29(5): 1451 – 1464

55. Faigenbaum AD. Strength Training for Children and Adolescents. In Cardinale, M., Newton R., Nowsaka K. Strength and Conditioning Biological Principles and Practical Applications. Wiley- Blackwell. 2011. 427 – 435

56. Soligard T. et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1030-1041. doi:10.1136/ bjsports-2016-096581

57. Arnold A., et al. Physeal Injuries in Youth Athletes: Risk Factors, Prevention, and Treatment Strategies. Sports Health 9 (2) 2017.

58. How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness Br J Sports Med 2016;50:1043-1052.

59. Meeusen, R., & De Pauw, K. (2018) Overtraining – what do we know? In M.Kellman & J. Beckmann (Eds), Sport, Recovery, and Performance: Interdisciplinary Insights (pp. 51-62). Abingdon: Routledge

60. Nosaka K. Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Delayed – onset Muscle Soreness(DOMS). In Cardinale, M., Newton R., Nowsaka K. Strength and Conditioning Biological Principles and Practical Applications. Wiley-Blackwell. 2011. 180 – 192

61. Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, et al. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol 2007;103:1565-75.

62. Duclay J, Martin A, Duclay A, et al. Behavior of fascicles and the myotendinous junction of human medial gastrocnemius following eccentric strength training. Muscle Nerve 2009;39:819-27.

63. Mahieu NN, McNair P, Cools A, et al. Effect of eccentric training on the plantar fl exor muscle- tendon tissue properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:117-23.

64. Nelson RT, Bandy WD. Eccentric training and static stretching improve hamstring flexibility of high school males. J Athl Train 2004;39:254-8.

65. Proske U, Morgan DL. Muscle damage from eccentric exercise: mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications. J Physiol (Lond) 2001;537:333-45.

66. O’Sullivan K, McAulifee S, DeBurca N. The effects of eccentric training on lower limb flexibility: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:838-845

67. Cook JL1, Purdam CR. Clin Sports Med. 2003 Oct;22(4):777-89. Rehabilitation of lower limb tendinopathies. Clin Sports Med. 2003 Oct;22(4):777-89

68. Jense D., Holmich P., Bandholm T., et al. Eccentric strengthening effect of hip adductor training with elastic bands in soccer players: a randomized control trial. Br J Sports Med 2012;0:1-8.

69. Lorenz D., Reiman M. The role and implementation of eccentric training in athletic rehabilitation : tendinopathy, hamstring strains, and ACL reconstruction. IJSPT. 2011; (6)1 : 27 – 44

70. Harris-Love MO., et al. Eccentric Exercise Program Design: A Periodization Model for Rehabilitation Applications. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017; 8: 1 – 16

71. Brukner P. Hamstring injuries: prevention and treatment, an update. Br J Sports Med 2015;0:1-4.

72. Stone ME, Stone ME, Sands WA. Principles and Practice of Resistance Training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2007

73. Stone MH and Stone ME. Recovery-adaptation: strength and power sports. Olympic Coach, 15(3), 12-15. 2003

74. Bompa, T., Buzzichelli C. Periodization for Sports Performance: 3rd Edition. Human Kinetics. 2015

75. McEwen BS, Wingfield JC. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm Behav. 2003;43:2-15.

76. Saxton, RA. Sabatini DM. mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease. Cell. Volume 168, Issue 6, p960-976, 9 March 2017

77. Subramanian A, Schilling TF. Tendon development and musculoskeletal assembly: emerging roles for the extracellular matrix development. 2015 Dec 15; 142(24): 4191-4204.

78. Engler AJ, Kumar S. Progress in Biology and Translational Science Mechanotransduction. Vol . 126

79. Sands WA. Thinking sensibly about recovery. Strength and Conditioning for Sports Performance. Routledge. 2016; 451-483

80. Mcewen BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. 2007 Jul;87(3):873-904.

81. Schulk, J. Homeostasis, Allostasis, and the Cost of Physiological Adaptation.

82. MacDougall D, Sale D. Neuromuscular Bases for Performance. In The Physiology of Training for High Performance. London: Oxford Press. 2014, 147 – 215

83. Rainoldi, A., Gazzoni, M. Neuromuscular Physiology. In Cardinale M, Newton R, Nosaka K, 2011. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford. 17-27

84. Rottweger J. Bone Physiology. In Cardinale M, Newton R, Nosaka K, 2011. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford. 29-43

85. Knapik, et al. Mechanosignaling in Bone Health, Trauma and Inflammation. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling Vol 20 (6) 2014.

86. Maffuli, N. Tendon Physiology. In Cardinale M, Newton R, Nosaka K, 2011. John Wiley & Sons: Oxford. 45-53

87. Haff EG., Trippley NH. Essentials of Strength and Conditioning: 4th Edition. 2015.

88. MacMahon JJ. Stretch-Shortening cycle and muscle-tendon stiffness. In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. 2018. New York: Routledge

89. MacDougall D, Sale D. Muscle Physiology; Stretch Shortening Cycle. In The Physiology of Training for High Performance. London: Oxford Press. 2014, 109 – 118

90. Sale, C., Plyometrics Training. In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. 2018. New York: Routledge, 274 – 290

91. Goodwin JE., Jeffreys I. Plyometric Training. In Jeffreys I, and Moody J. Strength and Conditioning for Sports Performance. New York: Routledge. 304 – 340

92. Reyes PJ., Contreras B., Morin JB.. Speed and Acceleration Training. In In Turner A, Comfort P; Advanced Strength and Conditioning: An Evidenced-Based Approach. 2018. New York: Routledge, 310- 326

93. Lloyd RS., Cronin JB. Plyometric Development in Youths. In Lloyd RS., Oliver JL., Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 2014. Routledge: New York. 94-106

94. Haff GG. Periodization strategies for youth development. In Lloyd RS., Oliver JL., Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 2014. Routledge: New York. 149 – 168